Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[Walt Cakebread]

This is as funny, and inaccurate, as May's claim that I insult people. May used to call people pedophiles, drug addicts, drunks, homosexuals and felons to name a few derogatory insults. What a joke.

Cakebread is one of yours. That is very obvious as he has an aversion to the evidence like all LNers do.

Cakebread is one of yours. That is very obvious as he has an aversion to the evidence like all LNers do.


Any rational reader can see that you're a nut Rob......A nut who believes that since I disagree with most of your goofy ideas I have to be a LNer....

is very obvious as he has an aversion to the evidence

I doubt there are many who agree with you.   

Let's look at one example....  I believe the evidence is overwhelming that the rifle that was found buried beneath boxes of books was a Model 91 / 38 Mannlicher Carcano, and that Carcano was the ONLY rifle that was found hidden in, or on, the TSBD that day.    You are on record as believing that a Mauser was found and Roger Craig examined that Mauser and saw 7.65 Mauser Stamped  "right there on the barrel".

All of the evidence supports my belief....   And As far as I know there isn't one iota of evidence that supports your belief.

[Richard Smith]

It is common to check references and past employers. No check of any kind was done on LHO. What was the rush?

So you have evidence that it was "common" in Oct. 1963 for Truly to check out the references of employees he hired to fill book orders?  Great, let's see it.  Once you have provided this evidence to establish that Oswald was treated differently from other similar hires, then explain to us what you are alleging with this line of discussion.  That Truly was a part of the plot in Oct?  It is interesting that Oswald was concerned with the number of dependents on his tax forms to save a few pennies in anticipation of the birth of his daughter.   I guess old Lee wasn't too concerned with becoming a patsy as of Oct. 15 or he wouldn't have cared much about the number of dependents that he listed. 

[Rob Caprio]

What email, without supporting evidence this is just another empty Caprio claim, and you know if you can't prove what Paul May said he could probably take legal action.

JohnM

It can't be proved since ALL of Yo Harvey's posts have been removed from ACJ. Isn't that convenient? I have removed my post given this state of affairs.

Why are you his constant spokesman?

[Rob Caprio]

So you have evidence that it was "common" in Oct. 1963 for Truly to check out the references of employees he hired to fill book orders?  Great, let's see it.  Once you have provided this evidence to establish that Oswald was treated differently from other similar hires, then explain to us what you are alleging with this line of discussion.  That Truly was a part of the plot in Oct?  It is interesting that Oswald was concerned with the number of dependents on his tax forms to save a few pennies in anticipation of the birth of his daughter.   I guess old Lee wasn't too concerned with becoming a patsy as of Oct. 15 or he wouldn't have cared much about the number of dependents that he listed.

Please. Outside of small towns were labor is hard to find it has always been common to check someone out before hiring them.

[John Mytton]

And you know that he wouldn't have gotten the job how? You just want people to believe that LHO got the job at thr TSBD in one day when it was their slow season. The day LHO started at the TSBD, without Truly even bothering to check him out, he could have had a good chance to secure a permanent job that paid $310 a month.

What was the rush to hire LHO when there had been layoffs already?

Again with the false accusations, I never said that Oswald couldn't get the job, I simply said that he was already on a good wicket.
Besides, the amount of money for the type work seems excessively high, do airports pay their menial labor so much more than minimum wage? I reckon the hours would have been awful, the work back breaking and perhaps to earn the big bucks lots of overtime?

JohnM

[John Mytton]

It can't be proved since ALL of Yo Harvey's posts have been removed from ACJ. Isn't that convenient? I have removed my post given this state of affairs.

Unbelievable, you have never had proof that Yo Harvey was Paul May, you have no proof that he posted anything yet you still felt compelled to link Paul May to some of the most horrendous crimes the world has ever seen. Shame on you Caprio.

JohnM

[Rob Caprio]

Again with the false accusations, I never said that Oswald couldn't get the job, I simply said that he was already on a good wicket.
Besides, the amount of money for the type work seems excessively high, do airports pay their menial labor so much more than minimum wage? I reckon the hours would have been awful, the work back breaking and perhaps to earn the big bucks lots of overtime?

JohnM

You would have to ask the Texas Unemployment Commission as they said that was the pay. I would guess it might have been an union job.

[Rob Caprio]

Unbelievable, you have never had proof that Yo Harvey was Paul May, you have no proof that he posted anything yet you still felt compelled to link Paul May to some of the most horrendous crimes the world has ever seen. Shame on you Caprio.

JohnM

Paul May has admitted that he was Yo Harvey on ACJ and the first version of this board. He called me some of those things on ACJ so I know from firsthand experience. I simply can't prove it since all of his posts are gone. That's why I removed my post.

Stop acting so outraged as numerous people have said the same thing over the years.