Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[Bill Chapman]

A lot of people here use their real names.  Walt, Rob, Martin, and me.  But also DVP, Paul May, Bill Brown.  It's just the gutless trolls who don't want to take any responsibility for their actions who hide behind aliases.

http://www.atheist-experience.com/people/john_iacoletti/
So you're an atheist living in Texas.

Funny (strange) when you said 'My God, I hope not' at the beginning of a show you had with Dillahunty here:



Freudian slip, John?
'Thank God I'm an atheist', goes the old joke.

Going to church is fire insurance to some folks
 

[John Mytton]

A lot of people here use their real names.  Walt, Rob, Martin, and me. 

 

How about Roger Collins?

Btw how can you prove that Walt, Rob and Martin are using their real names and geez what a coincidence that you picked these guys. Go Team Alpha!

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Too bad the negatives for the Hidell ID was found in possessions recovered from the Paine residence.

Too bad your exhibit doesn't have "Hidell" on it anywhere.

[John Iacoletti]

So you're an atheist living in Texas.

Yes -- is there some relevance to the JFK assassination?

Funny (strange) when you said 'My God, I hope not' at the beginning of a show you had with Dillahunty here:

Actually it was "oh gawd, I hope not". 

Glad you enjoy my volunteer work, but your purpose in bring that up here is...what exactly?

[John Iacoletti]

How about Roger Collins?

Don't know who that is.

Btw how can you prove that Walt, Rob and Martin are using their real names

Wouldn't you like to know.

and geez what a coincidence that you picked these guys. Go Team Alpha!

Hey, I also picked guys from your team Beta who at least have the guts to use their own names.

[Bill Chapman]

Yes -- is there some relevance to the JFK assassination?

Actually it was "oh gawd, I hope not". 

Glad you enjoy my volunteer work, but your purpose in bring that up here is...what exactly?

Seems your 'gawd' is Richard Dawkins 

Your fervour for insisting on what, to reasonable people, is an over-the-top standard of proof here, is now more fully understood. That is the relevance to the assassination.

Thanks for sharing.

[John Iacoletti]

Seems your 'gawd' is Richard Dawkins 

Where in the world did you get that?  Oh yeah, you just made it up.  Big surprise.

Your fervour for insisting on what, to reasonable people, is an over-the-top standard of proof here is now more fully understood. That is the relevance to the assassination.

Thanks for sharing.

Just evidence, rather than unsupported claims.  That's all it takes.  If you had it, you wouldn't need to divert with "reasonable people" and "over-the-top" excuses.

[Bill Chapman]

Where in the world did you get that?  Oh yeah, you just made it up.  Big surprise.

Just evidence, rather than unsupported claims.  That's all it takes.  If you had it, you wouldn't need to divert with "reasonable people" and "over-the-top" excuses.

Those are not excuses. They are observations. From the SaneStream.

Proof, you say? Well, it's hard to imagine just how much evidence it would take to convince a determined buff of anything, anything at all.

Dawkins calls 'believers' stupid. You call LNers lemmings. Both designations reek of desperation to get people to agree to whatever the f*ck your agendas are.