Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[John Iacoletti]

No need to prove anything: Brewer's and Postal's actions on 22 November 1963 (Texas Theater) are historical facts!

I’m talking about your claim that “it turned out” that the murderer was hiding in the Texas Theater.

[John Iacoletti]

Thank you for displaying your child like reasoning .......  I now understand why your favorite story is Alice In Wonderland.

Chapman thinks that silly irrelevant quips add to the conversation.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

A nonsensical comment (reply).

The "factors" do not point to Lee Harvey Oswald being set up. They describe how he would be inclined to attempt to assassinate President Kennedy from his workplace.

There no rule-book for assassins that says they must be photographed during the crime or when attempting to escape.

What "50 agents at a theater"? Johnny Calvin Brewer asked Julia Postal to call the Police. The Dallas cops were on high-alert due to the murder of Officer JD Tippit in the area. The Police thought there was "a chance" that the murderer was hiding in the Texas Theater: It turned out that he was.

Your last sentence is inane. You could insert an "s" in that word and it would still be accurate.

Prof English, what did you do wrong here?

There no rule-book for assassins that says they must be photographed during the crime or when attempting to escape.

There was one? 

It turned out that he was

So they did see him in the window?

Or you have photographic evidence showing an individual in that window?

Answer: No you don't.
 
Question: Why don't you?

Answer: Because it never happened

Too bad your bag of evidence does not support your conclusion. You are not the first sucker.

[Thomas Graves]

So they did see him in the window? Or you have photographic evidence showing an individual in that window?

Klienschmidt,

Are you sure photographic evidence would be sufficient?

I thought you, like Iacoletti, required notarized statements from fifteen witnesses, and DNA samples, too.

-- MWT 

PS  Oh, you mean the Sniper's Nest Window!

Hmm

Got a ticket I mean DNA samples?

If not, you ain't got popcorn I mean a case.

[Thomas Graves]

He didn't shoot Kennedy so the question is moot.

Freeman,

How do you know that?

"Crummy rifle, he sometimes got 'Maggie's Drawers' at 500 yards, and, gosh darn it, he said he was just a patsy, didn't he??"

LOL

Or is that just wishful thinking on your part, because, well ... you hate the evil, evil, evil CIA so doggone much!!!?

--  MWT 

[Ross Lidell]

Prof English, what did you do wrong here?

There was one? 

One what?

So they did see him in the window?

Or you have photographic evidence showing an individual in that window?

Answer: No you don't.
 
Question: Why don't you?

Answer: Because it never happened

Too bad your bag of evidence does not support your conclusion. You are not the first sucker.

Prof English, what did you do wrong here?

Enough with the cryptography?

There was one? 

One what?

So they did see him in the window?

Are you implying that Oswald must have been positively identified for him to have committed the assassination?

Or you have photographic evidence showing an individual in that window?

Not necessary for Oswald to be the assassin shooting from his workplace.

Answer: No you don't.

I don't need to.
 
Question: Why don't you?

See directly above.

Answer: Because it never happened

What never happened?

Too bad your bag of evidence does not support your conclusion. You are not the first sucker.

What evidence? Your last sentence is an assertion.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Prof English, what did you do wrong here?

Enough with the cryptography?

There was one? 

One what?

So they did see him in the window?

Are you implying that Oswald must have been positively identified for him to have committed the assassination?

Or you have photographic evidence showing an individual in that window?

Not necessary for Oswald to be the assassin shooting from his workplace.

Answer: No you don't.

I don't need to.
 
Question: Why don't you?

See directly above.

Answer: Because it never happened

What never happened?

Too bad your bag of evidence does not support your conclusion. You are not the first sucker.

What evidence? Your last sentence is an assertion.

You said:  "There no rule-book..." which of course, you still missed your error.

I said: There was one? 


So you see LHO shooting from that window? You either or you don't

[Ross Lidell]

You said:  "There no rule-book..." which of course, you still missed your error.

I said: There was one? 


So you see LHO shooting from that window? You either or you don't

There: no rule-book... [I missed a colon]

There's no rule-book... [I missed an apostrophe and an "s"]

There is no rule-book... [I missed the word "is"]

For Oswald not to be positively identified at the window from where shots were  fired does not exonerate him of assassinating President John F. Kennedy.