“Common sense and reason” is what “Richard” calls it when he makes up a narrative out of thin air.
Case in point. There’s no evidence whatsoever that Oswald “scouted” the building.
Baseless speculation. There’s no reason to assume that they had any “general patterns and behaviors” to be aware of, or that Oswald was in fact aware of any.
They didn’t “generally” lay flooring. In fact, it was less likely to be deserted this particular day than usual.
Notice how “Richard” just slips in his conclusion as an assumption?
There’s no evidence that a rifle was hidden on that floor prior to the motorcade arriving.
There’s no evidence Oswald went to the sixth floor when he arrived that morning. Or that he had a rifle.
Correct. It’s just self-serving made up BS.
There’s also no way to know that the clipboard found by Frankie Kaiser 11 days later was used by Oswald on November 22. Kaiser wasn’t even at work that day.
Again, assuming the conclusion. And why are you so dead set on making up details that cannot be known?
You haven’t even proven that he brought a rifle into the building.
LOL
No witnesses saw any shooting.
Suspect to your heart’s content. Just don’t pretend you’ve proven anything.
Implicate him for what? Touching book boxes that it was his job to get books out of? Or touching a bag that you can’t demonstrate ever contained a rifle?
Guilty until proven innocent. “Reasonable” to you means the thing you already believe.
Again, these are all claims based on biased assumptions (Oops, I mean “common sense”), not evidence.
All that’s highly indicative of is that his (alleged) story contradicts Frazier. Frazier’s story over the years also contradicts Frazier’s story.
It’s laughable that you think your subjective opinions are evidence.
You act like reaching a conclusion is in-and-of-itself a virtue. Even if you have to make things up to reach it.
Just because you have no doubt doesn’t mean there is no reasonable doubt. It’s not all about you.
What you are doing is what a corrupt prosecutor does when there is a foregone conclusion. Everything points to guilt.
“I am not a witch”
“Only a true witch will deny being a witch!”
“All right then, I’m a witch”
“She’s a witch — she admitted it!”
There’s no evidence that a rifle was hidden on that floor prior to the motorcade arriving.Actually the manner in which the rifle was found
IS evidence that the Carcano was hidden BEFORE the motorcade arrived....
The two officers who spotted the rifle ( Boone and Weitzman) said that the rifle was ON THE FLOOR beneath a pallet.... Seymour Weitzman said that he was down on the floor shining his flashlight beneath the pallet when he spotted the rifle
lying on the floor The rifle could NOT have been hidden in that manner AFTER the shooting.....Because, Baker and Truly arrived on the sixth floor about two minutes after the FIRST shot was fired. Baker and Truly would have seen anybody hiding the rifle....
