"Out with Bill Shelley in front"

[John Iacoletti]

I maintain and rely on my conclusion as stated. However, for clarification, if you feel a need to offer an objection, could you be a little more specific?

Yes, why do you think it's problematic at best for Oswald to have been on the first floor at 12:30 and on the second floor at 12:31:30?

[Larry Trotter]

Yes, why do you think it's problematic at best for Oswald to have been on the first floor at 12:30 and on the second floor at 12:31:30?

I just do not believe LHO was still on the first floor at 12:30:00PM, if OfficerBaker and SuperintendentTruly approached the entrance stairs and entered the bldg's 1st floor entrance, likely at 12:30:45pm, but most likely before 12:31:00pm, and in time for the SFLRE with an already in the lunchroom LHO at, as indicated, no later than 12:32:00pm, and possibly before 12:31:30pm.
 I did not say impossible, as I conclude it problematic, and, therefor my stated conclusion.

[Mark A. Oblazney]

I just do not believe LHO was still on the first floor at 12:30:00PM, if OfficerBaker and SuperintendentTruly approached the entrance stairs and entered the bldg's 1st floor entrance, likely at 12:30:45pm, but most likely before 12:31:00pm, and in time for the SFLRE with an already in the lunchroom LHO at, as indicated, no later than 12:32:00pm, and possibly before 12:31:30pm.
 I did not say impossible, as I conclude it problematic, and, therefor my stated conclusion.

I still have absolutely NO idea what you're trying to communicate, Mr. Trotter.  Ever try shortening your sentences?

[Alan Ford]

1. Oswald visits the second-floor lunchroom to buy a coke for his lunch.
2. Then Oswald takes this coke down to the first floor to eat his lunch.
3. Then Oswald returns up to the second-floor lunchroom to.... buy a coke for his lunch.

Something wrong with #3 here!

[John Iacoletti]

I just do not believe LHO was still on the first floor at 12:30:00PM, if OfficerBaker and SuperintendentTruly approached the entrance stairs and entered the bldg's 1st floor entrance, likely at 12:30:45pm, but most likely before 12:31:00pm, and in time for the SFLRE with an already in the lunchroom LHO at, as indicated, no later than 12:32:00pm, and possibly before 12:31:30pm.
 I did not say impossible, as I conclude it problematic, and, therefor my stated conclusion.

Yes, you just didn't explain what makes it problematic.

[John Iacoletti]

He really liked Coke.

[Larry Trotter]

I just do not believe LHO was still on the first floor at 12:30:00PM, if OfficerBaker and SuperintendentTruly approached the entrance stairs and entered the bldg's 1st floor entrance, likely at 12:30:45pm, but most likely before 12:31:00pm, and in time for the SFLRE with an already in the lunchroom LHO at, as indicated, no later than 12:32:00pm, and possibly before 12:31:30pm.
 I did not say impossible, as I conclude it problematic, and, therefor my stated conclusion.

Yes, you just didn't explain what makes it problematic.

Okay John, can you explain why I should not conclude as problematic, the assertion that LHO was still on the TSBD 1st floor at 12:30pm?

[John Iacoletti]

Okay John, can you explain why I should not conclude as problematic, the assertion that LHO was still on the TSBD 1st floor at 12:30pm?

Because I don't see what the problem is.