Ok Iacoletti or whatever you name is, you have all the WC facts and the accumulated evidence of thousands of researchers putting millions of hours into this case, what's your conclusion?
My conclusion is that there is insufficient evidence to determine who killed JFK. If you disagree, then you need to specify what that evidence is,
a) without lying about or misrepresenting the evidence that exists
b) without appealing to speculation, assumption, and handwaving
c) without ignoring the real provenance issues with every single piece of what little physical evidence does exist
d) without cherry-picking unreliable and uncorroborated witness statements and claims
Regurgitating Bugliosi's 53 will not cut it, because they all violate one or more of the above.
