Proof JFK was killed as a result of a conspiracy.

[Royell Storing]

As I said, we have sourced information that Zapruder knew the shots came from right behind him in the form of a TV interview minutes right after the assassination and his Warren Commission testimony.  This thread is not about Mr. Blevins or what you think about Mr. Blevins.  This thread is about proof that JFL was killed as a result of a conspiracy.  I have hard evidence that shows a gunman in the pergola "shelter". 

Do you have a comment on this evidence?

      As I pointed out earlier, including the ALTERED Moorman Photo shifts the attention Away from the other evidence you posted. That ALTERED Photo has forced you into a purely Defensive position. Getting away from that Photo will find your conspiracy case having a worthy foundation.
       People in general are pretty fast & loose with their verbiage. When someone says "right behind" they do Not necessarily mean Directly Behind. Zapruder testified as to motorcycle cops being behind him also. Do you think he meant that DPD cops were running around behind him/inside the shelter?  The Willis Black Dog Man Photo gives us a pretty good view/look inside the Shelter behind Zapruder. There are other images showing pretty good looks inside that shelter seconds before the Kill Shot. Nobody is visible inside that Shelter. There could have been people hiding inside there I would guess, but if you were a shooter inside that shelter you certainly would be getting set-up for your shot(s). To believe that a hired Professional Hit Man popped out of that Shelter at the last second or 2 is silly. Sure, it is possible but really Not plausible.
       I do believe your image shows gun smoke. I also believe Holland saw this same smoke and other witnesses up wind from the TSBD smelled that same gun smoke.   

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

Nope, it is your opinion that the Moorman photo shows a shooter behind Zapruder. It is not a fact no matter how strongly you believe it.

Nope, you are blind to the obvious.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

There is no altered Mary Moorman photo.  Do you have proof that it is altered?  Since you keep harping about it, it must be true.  Since it is true, do you have proof that it is altered?

[Nicholas Turner]

Nope, you are blind to the obvious.

In your opinion.

[Royell Storing]

There is no altered Mary Moorman photo.  Do you have proof that it is altered?  Since you keep harping about it, it must be true.  Since it is true, do you have proof that it is altered?

    Taking a B/W Image and Colorizing it = ALTERED. Cropping an Image = ALTERED.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

    Taking a B/W Image and Colorizing it = ALTERED. Cropping an Image = ALTERED.

Do you have proof that the image is altered?

You want to see what you want to see.  You cannot help anyone.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

In your opinion.

I don't have an opinion, just facts.  You have opinions without providing facts.

[Jerry Freeman]

Strong personal beliefs are not knowing.

How do you know that? Knowledge is defined  by Webster's as...
 

facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject.

Knowledge is acquired by an adversarial process. As Walt stated...there is God or there isn't. It is foolish to state that there is no God when no one can possibly demonstrate this. There is climate change [global warming] or there isn't. It is adversely argued that while there may be climate change, it is not caused by people. On the other hand, it can be argued that CFCs, coal, fossil fuel and other pollutants could be doing the atmosphere no benefit at all.
The Warren Commission Report approached the JFK assassination from only one direction. There was no consideration of any conclusion other than Oswald was the sole assassin. It was a blatant choice..extremely obvious and it remains so. Reasonable doubt did not take a back seat in the so called investigation ...it was not even along for the ride. For the authorities to not arrive at the conclusion that it ultimately did [right or wrong] was just simply unacceptable.