I guess it was Jim Marrs that brought attention to these Dealey pictures...........
.....
Jerry, unfortunately you must not have read my reply to Joe Elliott's challenge because your post
plays right into his hands, after I scrupulously avoided doing any such thing. Your content in your last
post is influencing me to abandon further participation in this thread I initiated. Raise the bar, attempt
to discern the difference between CT garbage and disciplined, well supported, minimally speculative research.
Please post discredited CT infotainment in another thread? Please!
If there a full moon or something? I've seen some nutty ramblings on this forum but this stuff is real tin foil hat material. I can't even make heads or tails out of the random newspaper articles. Bizarre and sad.
And Mr. Smith, post examples of anything I have posted that merits your simplistic, shallow, BS, discussion
avoidance critique. Take your stock, predictable disruption elsewhere! It is what is actually sad. Your schtick of
moaning about your own lack of interest, comprehension deficit, and refusal to click on the supporting linked
pages I included in my earlier posts and avoidance of visiting them to perform a thorough, thoughtful read is
your deliberately created problem. Your critique emphasizing your alleged confusion is a poor substitute for
posting questions. i approved every comment appearing at jfkfacts.org for ten months, 2015 - 2016. I am in
a position to observe there are a lot better critics and discussion avoidance/disruption trolls operating in these forums than you.
Do not expect you can lay that on me. I present original, unique, and new
material. No one requests that you read it or not read it but deface this thread, anyway. Take your disruption elsewhere.
Bush taunts in his Ford eulogy were sad.