Who Killed Kennedy

[Richard Smith]

You and your kindred freely post your opinions endlessly here and other places.  That is hard to square with the government "muzzling" anyone.
Muzzles??...  The government simply discredits ( or attempts to discredit ) anybody who criticizes the official government approved tale.   

 If you truly believed you had credible evidence that proves a conspiracy to murder the president, you would feel compelled to go to some respected media outlet like the NY Times and present your case.
I should go to the very ones who have dumped the big lie on us???

 no one else takes you seriously and that even you don't really believe your own nonsense?

You're a liar Mr "smith...  The very fact that you constantly feel compelled to discredit me, speaks loud and clear that "someone" takes me seriously.

Surely there must be one media outlet over 55 years after the event that is not under the control of the conspirators?  And you would be compelled as someone with the evidence that absolves Oswald to approach them in a matter of this importance.  Anyone involved in a JFK conspiracy in 1963 is either dead or drooling their soup in a senior citizens home.  Not very dangerous or powerful.  Just own up to the truth for once.  You don't have confidence in the "evidence" that you present here.  It is not credible.  No informed source in the real world beyond these Internet forums would do anything other than fall over laughing at such claims.   

[Walt Cakebread]

Surely there must be one media outlet over 55 years after the event that is not under the control of the conspirators?  And you would be compelled as someone with the evidence that absolves Oswald to approach them in a matter of this importance.  Anyone involved in a JFK conspiracy in 1963 is either dead or drooling their soup in a senior citizens home.  Not very dangerous or powerful.  Just own up to the truth for once.  You don't have confidence in the "evidence" that you present here.  It is not credible.  No informed source in the real world beyond these Internet forums would do anything other than fall over laughing at such claims.

Question:....  Why are you compelled to try to discredit my posts?

[Bill Chapman]

Which basically mirrors our society here in the U.S. as the aging population dies off.

Our youth have been given plenty of distractions (since 9/11 especially)  to keep them busy. No time / inkling to refute (or even raise an eyebrow) the lie that LHO killed JFK is uttered/written. Very few "youngsters" today are even interested in the shooting, let alone dig into to the details.

I did my own little "study" of that a few years back when my daugther was in high school. Not many kids her age really gave a "rats behind" about the JFK assassination, many knew very little about it and nary a one had even seen the Zapruder film.  When I showed that film to my daughter and about 6-7 of her friends, I then asked which direction did the head shot come from.  "From in front of the car somewhere..." was the general retort.

Then I tell them about the SBT.

They were all shocked at the WC version, even laughed about "how stupid people were back then"  to believe that one.  I'm guessing the same goes for most under the age of 25 these days -  that have never read/seen anything other than the "History Channel" or read a "history book" in school.

So these kids, who have seen plenty of movies showing bullets throwing bodies every which way, are your go-to? Great research!

[Bill Chapman]

Surely there must be one media outlet over 55 years after the event that is not under the control of the conspirators?  And you would be compelled as someone with the evidence that absolves Oswald to approach them in a matter of this importance.  Anyone involved in a JFK conspiracy in 1963 is either dead or drooling their soup in a senior citizens home.  Not very dangerous or powerful.  Just own up to the truth for once.  You don't have confidence in the "evidence" that you present here.  It is not credible.  No informed source in the real world beyond these Internet forums would do anything other than fall over laughing at such claims.

The sane-stream media currently has their hands full laughing at Trump.

Waldo could always try Fox & Friends...

[Walt Cakebread]

The sane-stream media currently has their hands full laughing at Trump.

Waldo could always try Fox & Friends...

The sly and wily fox has few friends....   

[Eddie Haymaker]

ok forget the kids

convince ME of the SBT please

please show me how a bullet goes from the 3rd thoracic to the throat

you couldn't recreate that shot lying down.

please enlighten us with your evidence

[Jack Trojan]

ok forget the kids

convince ME of the SBT please

please show me how a bullet goes from the 3rd thoracic to the throat

you couldn't recreate that shot lying down.

please enlighten us with your evidence

Don't let them pull any "I've been a LNer before you were born" crap. You are correct Eddie. They are trying to discredit/dismiss your claims because that is all they got. That is their MO.

Here is proof (if you believe the x-rays are authentic) that the MB was BS.

The bullet clearly smashed thru the T2 vertebrae and exited the throat.



Here is JFK's body position if that was the case.



Was JFK bent over to that degree? No. So the MB is BS.

Experiment for yourself. Get in between 2 lasers pointed at each other as shown below. Line up the lower laser at your throat at approx. C6/7. Does the high laser strike your back as per the autopsy photo at T2? Or is it where Gerald Ford moved it to?

[Eddie Haymaker]

Yeah, people here are apparently super qualified

and thats great because I need them to explain this ridiculous theory to me

Why are we called ct's when some of their theories are even more

unbelievable

they pile questions on questions but never have any answer's

BTW I thought the FBI concluded @21 degree's ?