Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?

[Royell Storing]

Near horizontal in anatomical-position. The wounding position was different.




JFK's wounding position was about in the middle of what's shown above.

Sure, I see an "impact" in the frame possibly caused by a metal fragment. I just don't see your so-called "bullet hole."

Ask him for books on basic anatomy and forensics.

   

   BUMP

[Eddie Haymaker]

you were right Mr Storing

right to "I dont see no bullet hole"

Its the classic setup where I say "not a hole an impact"

"Well,If it was a bullet It would make a hole"

Do these guys take some deluded pride  in defending this crap?

There should be a fresh congressional investigation into the JFK crime

based on that picture alone

[Bill Chapman]

Now that's funny - "a third head" LOLOL. I thought only CTers were only kooks and loons but you take the cake on this one. Maybe you can reach out to Myers and he'll throw some pixels together and create that third head.

LOL

You continue to demonstrate that your IQ is smaller than your shoe size. The 'third head' refers to the 'in between' position, the one equidistant between the two.

Either you're a gaslighting troll, implying a three-headed Kennedy.. or are profoundly stupid.

[Michael Walton]

The car was on a slight incline. The angle from the so-called shooting nest on the 6th floor has a downward angle. Yet Bill chooses to take a deformed body illustration and then wants us to squeeze a third head in between the other two.

Funny stuff, Bill!

[Royell Storing]

you were right Mr Storing

right to "I dont see no bullet hole"

Its the classic setup where I say "not a hole an impact"

"Well,If it was a bullet It would make a hole"

Do these guys take some deluded pride  in defending this crap?

There should be a fresh congressional investigation into the JFK crime

based on that picture alone

    Can you picture a lawyer presenting that 2 headed visual aid to a jury and saying, "Now imagine a head in the middle........." ??  "My Cousin Vinny" worthy material.

[Eddie Haymaker]

I......dentical

 

[Eddie Haymaker]

At least an inch higher than the clavicle (feel that on your neck)

Which means the rear bullet had to strike higher than that from behind

It has to hit JFK squarely in the lower neck - which is NOT EVEN CLOSE

To the actual wounds.Clearly shot in the upper back and not the neck (official

autopsy photos wiki page) The MB would be an OBVIOUS neck shot from behind.



This wound is obviously too low to support the MBT.

you see the unusual wound shape? Surgical tweezers/clamps have removed the bullet

and left their telltale marks on the wound.

DO YOU accept this as an accurate autopsy picture? nutters?



That says 5-6 inches BELOW THE COLLAR

A WR diagram



ALL THE EVIDENCE STACKED UP HERE BY THE WR

PROVES 5-6 INCHES DOWN FROM THE COLLAR

The WR says the MB did not hit bone in JFK

So he apparently had no spinal column

Because the front "exit" wound is directly in the middle of the throat

and the bullet exited at high velocity

[Royell Storing]

I......dentical

 

   "Now. Mrs Riley, and Only Mrs Riley"