You may have a point that the photograph could help disprove the SBT. As far as I know, the FBI did not extract any metal from the windshield frame when gathering and weighing all the bullet fragments. That was a significant fragment and some or all of it may have been embedded deep into the frame. If the fragments exceed the mass of a 6.5 mm bullet, that would disprove the SBT by itself.
As far as I know, the FBI did not extract any metal from the windshield frame when gathering and weighing all the bullet fragments. The damage to the chrome molding was a deep dent....The bullet did not penetrate through the molding. Please explain how it would be possible to "extract any metal from the windshield frame" when the molding covering the frame had not been penetrated??? If you're actually looking for facts....measure the size of the dent by using the sun visor clip as a scale. I'm sure that you'll find that the dent was made by a .45 caliber bullet.
You mean how you've framed the evidence.
I didnt frame anythingevidence is evidenceIt stands by itselfand that picture SHOULD dispel this ridiculous MBT forever
firm?The sitting president disagreed with it (& you)and 1 commissioner refused to sign off on ityou guys...are holier than the pope!lolis that the very best you can do?