JD Tippit - Serious timing issues

[Tim Nickerson]

wow

there it is

I could deny that and say it was 2 weeks later or
what about the evidence of davis and burroughs

but It is clear - she says he arrived about 1.30-1.35pm

It matches JB'ers affidavit (1.30pm)

If you cannot concede in an intelligent debate

its not an intelligent debate

you got me

touche

 

Took you long enough. But good on you just the same.

[Tim Nickerson]

wow

there it is

I could deny that and say it was 2 weeks later or
what about the evidence of davis and burroughs

but It is clear - she says he arrived about 1.30-1.35pm

It matches JB'ers affidavit (1.30pm)

If you cannot concede in an intelligent debate

its not an intelligent debate

you got me

touche

 

If you wish to carry on here with intelligent debate, you're going to be doing an awful lot of conceding. Sorry, but that's just the way it is. You have the evidence to deal with.

[Eddie Haymaker]

gloating 2 posts in a row?

Its unbecoming

try and be gracious

there's a good gentleman

Oswald did not fire the final bullet
The WR was a cover up

everything else is open ended IMO

I try and keep an open mind

[Tim Nickerson]

gloating 2 posts in a row?

Its unbecoming

try and be gracious

there's a good gentleman

I never gloat. You are reading something into my posts that is not there.

[Eddie Haymaker]

hell,he might have even shot JD

It is possible IMO

but he sure as heck didn't kill JFK

there were others involved

[Tim Nickerson]

Oswald did not fire the final bullet
The WR was a cover up

everything else is open ended IMO

I try and keep an open mind

See, that's the problem that you are confronted with. The evidence. That evidence points towards Oswald having fired all three shots.

[Eddie Haymaker]

yeah - NO

the headshot to the temple is undeniable
the WR is a farce
the HSCA agree's with me (probable conspiracy)
not you

most (over half) of Americans believe there was more than 1 shooter

So you are in the minority pal

so by definition aren't you guys the kooks now?

[Tim Nickerson]

the headshot from the front is undeniable

The headshot from the front is absolutely deniable. The momentum of a bullet strike wouldn't cause the degree of movement seen in the Zapruder film. Kennedy's head moved about 2 inches forward between frames z312 and Z313. That's from the momentum of the strike. The violent back and to the left movement was a neuromuscular reaction.

the WR is a farce

You mean the report itself? Whatever. I don't care. I rarely reference the 888 page Report. It's the 26 supporting volumes where it's at.

the HSCA agree's with me (probable conspiracy)
not you

They agree with you do they? You're 95% sure that there was a conspiracy? OK, here's a few other of their findings:

Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.

- President Kennedy was struck by two rifle shots fired from behind him.

- The shots that struck President Kennedy from behind him were fired from the sixth floor window of the southeast corner of the Texas School Book Depository building.

- Lee Harvey Oswald owned the rifle that was used to fire the shots from the sixth floor window of the southeast comer of the Texas School Book Depository building.

- Lee Harvey Oswald, shortly before the assassination, had access to and was present on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository building.

- Lee Harvey Oswald's other actions tend to support the conclusion that he assassinated President Kennedy

most (over half) of Americans believe there was more than 1 shooter

So you are in the minority pal

So what? How many of those Americans have read the volumes of the Warren Report or even examined any of the evidence themselves?

so by definition aren't you guys the kooks now?

LOL! What? Is that how it works?