Name your shooter

[John Iacoletti]

Just show us how a 2ft package can be 'almost touching the ground' when carried by a 5'9" Oswald in the way described by Randle.

Randle did exactly that when she did her experiment with agent McNeely.

[John Iacoletti]

Iacoletti is the one using 2ft as his go-to size
I'm at Carcano breakdown size

Of course you are. Even though there is no evidence that the Carcano was broken down or in a bag.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Just show us how a 2ft package can be 'almost touching the ground' when carried by a 5'9" Oswald in the way described by Randle.

Show me that Oswald owned that rifle. Since it was not his rifle, it messes your story up. Curtain rods were in the bag just like he said. Pretty basic

[Bill Chapman]

Show me that Oswald owned that rifle. Since it was not his rifle, it messes your story up. Curtain rods were in the bag just like he said. Pretty basic

Go out and get a tape measure
Maybe you lot can pass the hat around

[John Mytton]

Iacoletti is the one using 2ft as his go-to size
I'm at Carcano breakdown size

JohnM

[Ray Mitcham]

Go out and get a tape measure
Maybe you lot can pass the hat around

Here is 5'9" guy holding a 24" tape coloured in as per a paper bag.


I notice you can't afford  tape measure, Chappers.

[Ray Mitcham]

This the same 5'9"guy holding a 37" tape coloured in as per the bag, Notice how high, and forward of his body, the holder would have to carry the 8 lb paper
bag for it not to touch the floor, as per Randles comments. Who in their right mind would carry that heavy a bag in like that?

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Go out and get a tape measure
Maybe you lot can pass the hat around

That is not an argument you are just showing something within the parameters but as you know it only mattered IF AND ONLY IF you were able to prove he owned the gun and prove everything else surrounding the gun ...When are you going to say Oswald was hiding in one of the boxes?