What an effen moron. You cannot even articulate a position with ANYTHING at all worthy of a response. You attack for the sake of attacking. Doesn?t matter to you whether Horne was unqualified. As long as he was another kook, you will attack anybody disputing his credentials or qualifications. That is how pathetic you are as a researcher. You?re a clown and a desperate one at that. One more conspiracy loon seeking approval.
You cannot even articulate a position with ANYTHING at all worthy of a response. So why do you respond?
You attack for the sake of attacking. Feeling paranoid? Are you the same guy who insults people for entertainment?
All I did was point out that you have no proof for the wild claims you made and given your reply, lacking such proof, I'd say I am right.
Doesn?t matter to you whether Horne was unqualified. Where did I say that? Stop making up strawman arguments....
As long as he was another kook, you will attack anybody disputing his credentials or qualifications.Just amazing what you think you know..... and it's my guess you actually believe it as well..
Btw, in this thread, who, other than some unqualified guy who has read some books, disputes Horne's credentials and where and how exactly did I attack him?
That is how pathetic you are as a researcher.When did I ever claim to be a researcher? Actually, I don't think a researcher would waste much time talking to you, since you constantly claim to be here for entertainment purposes....
You?re a clown and a desperate one at that.Isn't there a saying that goes: "It takes one to know one"?
One more conspiracy loon seeking approval. Approval from whom?