Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lack Of Damage To CE-399  (Read 83133 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #208 on: February 15, 2019, 06:57:11 PM »
Advertisement
        That photo of CE 399 does Not display roughly 90% of the bullet. This is right in line with the JFK Autopsy Photo where a Dr is pulling JFK's hair Up & Over the Entire Back of his Head. Like the audience viewing a David Copperfield performance, this chicanery prompts everyone to ask themselves, "Just What is this guy trying to hide?"

That photo of CE 399 does Not display roughly 90% of the bullet

LOL 

But 100% of the rear view. See the side view for the other 90%
By your calculations, it seems you guys are the ones hiding something... that 10% 

But congrats on being the first CTer to include the CE399 butt-end view in a post.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2019, 07:00:56 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #208 on: February 15, 2019, 06:57:11 PM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #209 on: February 15, 2019, 07:55:35 PM »
That photo of CE 399 does Not display roughly 90% of the bullet LOL 
But 100% of the rear view. See the side view for the other 90% By your calculations, it seems you guys are the ones hiding something... that 10%But congrats on being the first CTer  to include the CE399 butt-end view in a post.

So the bullet came out backwards 
   
So much drivel over the most improbable theory [Only because if it doesn't work ...then it doesn't work]

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #210 on: February 15, 2019, 09:05:40 PM »

So the bullet came out backwards 
   
So much drivel over the most improbable theory [Only because if it doesn't work ...then it doesn't work]

I have in my possession a 6.5mm carcano bullet that I fired into a water trap.... It looks nearly identical to CE 399...  My bullet is of Italian manufacture so the jacket is white colored metal....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #210 on: February 15, 2019, 09:05:40 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #211 on: February 15, 2019, 10:28:45 PM »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #212 on: February 15, 2019, 10:40:19 PM »
I have in my possession a 6.5mm carcano bullet that I fired into a water trap.... It looks nearly identical to CE 399...  My bullet is of Italian manufacture so the jacket is white colored metal....

Lets see you post an image of that 'nearly identical to CE 399' water bullet

BTW, where there any rib bones involved that watery test?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #212 on: February 15, 2019, 10:40:19 PM »


Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #213 on: February 15, 2019, 11:41:23 PM »
BTW, where there any rib bones involved that watery test?

No, that was the point. So for a FMJ bullet, it is your contention:

Striking
C7/rib/wrist=pristine (intact with no DNA)
skull=disintegrated (explosive with DNA splattered all over)
« Last Edit: February 15, 2019, 11:45:29 PM by Jack Trojan »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #214 on: February 15, 2019, 11:43:39 PM »
Lets see you post an image of that 'nearly identical to CE 399' water bullet

BTW, where there any rib bones involved that watery test?

BTW, where there any rib bones involved that watery test?

No bones involved..... But I did recover one bullet that stuck the side of the water trap .... It struck at a very shallow angle  and it was badly bent and flattened....

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #215 on: February 16, 2019, 05:27:52 AM »
How is this a "well established principle of law"?

If each piece of evidence individually doesn't meet a reasonable doubt standard, then how could they possibly meet it when combined?

BINGO !

Quote
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4272#relPageId=23&tab=page


https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4272#relPageId=26&tab=page

........

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh2/html/WC_Vol2_0191b.htm


https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh2/html/WC_Vol2_0193a.htm

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh2/html/WC_Vol2_0195b.htm

Is the obvious and practical solution to the "lawyering" resulting in deliberate deception and obfuscation,
to  /disbar/imprison/(perhaps) execute the offending attorneys deliberately undermining our National Security these untolled years?
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0060a.htm


« Last Edit: February 16, 2019, 06:38:58 AM by Tom Scully »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #215 on: February 16, 2019, 05:27:52 AM »