Lincoln Assassination Status: a Still Open or Reopenable FBI Investigation?

[John Iacoletti]

“Fake-quoted”. LOL

Are you ever going to answer the question?

[Bill Chapman]

“Fake-quoted”. LOL

Are you ever going to answer the question?

You put those words in quotes
I didn't say them therefore you faked them as mine.
You are not allowed to twist what I said

[John Iacoletti]

You put those words in quotes
I didn't say them therefore you faked them as mine.
You are not allowed to twist what I said

Changing the verb tense to form a grammatically correct sentence is not twisting or faking anything.  And you still avoid the question.  You said:

"Your species seems overjoyed with Whaley's observation and have practically declared the little snot innocent".

Please provide an example of anybody in my species (whatever the hell you mean by that) doing either of these things.

[Bill Chapman]

And by "on the scene", you mean somewhere in the TSBD building?  That's useful.

Relevance?

Apparently no one saw Oswald at 12:30, so yeah, that's useful

Oswald had a jacket on at the Tippit scene.
I thought you said the lineup was unfair
Why wouldn't you want him dressed as he was at the Tippit scene?

Oh, wait...

[John Iacoletti]

Apparently no one saw Oswald at 12:30, so yeah, that's useful

Not useful at all.  There were at least 6 other people in the TSBD alone who nobody saw at 12:30.

Oswald had a jacket on at the Tippit scene.

Uh, you haven't demonstrated that Oswald was at the "Tippit scene".

I thought you said the lineup was unfair

It was.

Why wouldn't you want him dressed as he was at the Tippit scene?

Nobody in the lineup was wearing a jacket.  What's your point?

Oh, wait...

Maybe you'll stumble onto a point eventually.

[Bill Chapman]

Not useful at all.  There were at least 6 other people in the TSBD alone who nobody saw at 12:30.
>>> They had alibis. Oswald had lies. Well Oswald was not completely inside the building @12:30

Uh, you haven't demonstrated that Oswald was at the "Tippit scene".
>>> Uh, others have.

It was.
>>> No it wasn't. Showing Oswald in only a T-shirt was more than fair to him since he was wearing a jacket @Tippit

Nobody in the lineup was wearing a jacket.  What's your point?
>>> See above

Maybe you'll stumble onto a point eventually.
>>> See above

[Bill Chapman]

Changing the verb tense to form a grammatically correct sentence is not twisting or faking anything.  And you still avoid the question.  You said:

"Your species seems overjoyed with Whaley's observation and have practically declared the little snot innocent".

Please provide an example of anybody in my species (whatever the hell you mean by that) doing either of these things.

Your grammar sucks: Show us where "overjoyment" is an actual word, Professor.
And tell us which of the many meanings of the word practically you are applying here.

You said:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Evidence of this "overjoyment"?  Or this "practical declaration"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@Lurkers: I said overjoyed and practically declared
 I used the for-all-intents-and-purposes meaning of the word 'practically'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

[John Iacoletti]

>>> They had alibis. Oswald had lies. Well Oswald was not completely inside the building @12:30

Add “alibi” to the list of terms that Chapman doesn’t understand.

Uh, you haven't demonstrated that Oswald was at the "Tippit scene".
>>> Uh, others have.

Uh, no they haven’t.

>>> No it wasn't. Showing Oswald in only a T-shirt was more than fair to him since he was wearing a jacket @

You think that somehow makes a lineup “fair”?