Still ignored are the recorded statements of the US Army marksmen who testified that the weapon that was found... was in summary --a seriously unreliable piece of crap. Therefor this thread should not even be------------------ That would be too much salt. Upon what do you base Oswald's supposed 'skill' as a competent shooter?
So the US Army marksman offered an "opinion" that the rifle (C2766) was "a seriously unreliable piece of crap". That opinion would be more credible if it was accompanied by a detailed explanation. That it was not, renders it of no merit.
Basis of Oswald's skill as a competent shooter: Training and assessment of marksmanship ability while in the US Marine Corp. Oswald attained the status of "Sharpshooter".
Prove to me that it is not
possible for an unskilled, incompetent shooter to achieve a fluke hit (twice) on a moving target at close range?