BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963

[Oscar Navarro]

That and $5.00 will get you a coffee at Starbuck's.

I can get coffee for half that at Sergio's. Cuban coffee at that not that muddy water served at that overhyped and overpriced joint.

[Oscar Navarro]

You have already decided what's what. But none of that proves anything in a scenario where Oswald is truly innocent. If he's truly guilty, then people can review all of these uncommon Oswald actions and easily see a pattern.

If he's truly guilty? Do you seriously have any doubts that Oswald shot JFK, JBC and Tippit?

[Alan Ford]

The Paine garage.

Thank you, Mr Navarro! 

Now!

The visit by the WC (accompanied by Agent Howlett) to the Paine home, during which two curtain rods belonging to Ms Ruth Paine were inspected and taken away, did not take place until March 23.

Would you agree with the statement that March 15 came before March 23?

If so, how do you explain the fact that----in your own words----"The SS requested the DPD to fingerprint the curtain rods on 3/15/1964"?

 

[John Iacoletti]

I guess you haven't read the OP. There's a Mrs. Roberts who might have seen "Oswald carrying a package long enough to carry a rifle". That's three people who saw Oswald carrying a bag that wasn't his lunch. And, apparently, you don't have any idea how circumstantial evidence works.

In your mind, the way evidence works is that a "package large enough to carry a rifle" (whatever that means) cannot carry a lunch? Must be some weird lunch bag legislation in Dallas that I'm unaware of.  How many of these people said that the bag they saw wasn't a lunch?

If you think "long bag" is even circumstantial evidence of a rifle, then you're the one who doesn't understand evidence.

[Alan Ford]

In your mind, the way evidence works is that a "package large enough to carry a rifle" (whatever that means) cannot carry a lunch? Must be some weird lunch bag legislation in Dallas that I'm unaware of.  How many of these people said that  the bag they saw wasn't a lunch?

If you think "long bag" is even circumstantial evidence of a rifle, then you're the one who doesn't understand evidence.

These goons also think it defies the laws of physics for a man to put a small bag (containing lunch) into a larger bag (containing curtain rods) for convenience's sake!

[John Iacoletti]

I can get coffee for half that at Sergio's. Cuban coffee at that not that muddy water served at that overhyped and overpriced joint.

Good point.  What you are 100% positive about regarding who killed JFK and Tippit and $2.50 will get you a cup of Cuban coffee at Sergio's.

[Bill Chapman]

How many times has this been discussed and you still don't get it.  Just because Oswald had a bag in the parking lot doesn't mean he carried a bag into the TSBD.  In fact, the only witness to him entering the TSBD said that he was not.

Just because Oswald had a bag in the parking lot doesn't mean he carried a bag into the TSBD.  In fact, the only witness to him entering the TSBD said that he was not
>>> Just because JackD didn't see Oswald carrying a bag doesn't automatically mean that he wasn't.

[John Iacoletti]

If he's truly guilty? Do you seriously have any doubts that Oswald shot JFK, JBC and Tippit?

It doesn't take much to run afoul of the orthodoxy...