BWF and LMR may not have been the only ones who saw LHO with a bag on 11/22/1963

[Alan Ford]

Exactly.

The police thought that folk dancing phonograph records and headache tablets were pertinent to their investigation, but not a brown paper wrapped package of curtain rods?  Or an imperial reflex camera for that matter...

C'mon....

Whether or not Mr Oswald had actually brought an apple to work that day, as he had claimed, was a further issue. Perhaps all the remaining apples in Ms Paine's kitchen were submitted for fingerprinting as well? Obviously there must be some missing documentation on this.   

[Tim Nickerson]

This is just priceless. We have a die-hard LNer, cornered by the facts, resorting to accusing the WC of falsifying the on-the-record receipt of evidence! 

I'm not accusing the WC of falsifying evidence.

[Alan Ford]

I'm aware of how Jenner came to assign them the numbers 275 and 276. He just added Ruth's name to the numbers that had already been attached to them on March 15.

  

Nope! Mr Jenner chose-----------for no clear reason------------to begin with the number 270 when marking items taken on-the-record from the Paine home:



Funny how he just so happened to arrive at 275 by the time he reached the first curtain rod! And just look at those essential items he picked up before reaching the curtain rods. No fewer than 3 pieces of string! 

On your own scenario, Mr Nickerson, the choice of 270 as a starting point, as well as the number of items reached before 275 was reached, was part of an elaborate sham for the benefit of the American public:
---------------The rods were being 'found' by the very man who had submitted them for testing 8 days earlier
---------------The WC testimony taker contrived his arrival at 275 for the first curtain rod.

Welcome to the CT community, Mr Nickerson! 

[Alan Ford]

I'm not accusing the WC of falsifying evidence.

 

You are accusing your beloved WC of falsifying the on-the-record receipt of evidence!

[John Iacoletti]

As to why they were returned only to be "found" again, one can only speculate. Perhaps to dramatically confirm that not only was Ruth Paine aware of them but that she knew exactly where they were located.

That?s quite possibly the silliest speculation I?ve ever seen on any aspect of the case.

[Tim Nickerson]

 

Nope! Mr Jenner chose-----------for no clear reason------------to begin with the number 270 when marking items taken on-the-record from the Paine home:



Funny how he just so happened to arrive at 275 by the time he reached the first curtain rod! And just look at those essential items he picked up before reaching the curtain rods. No fewer than 3 pieces of string! 

On your own scenario, Mr Nickerson, the choice of 270 as a starting point, as well as the number of items reached before 275 was reached, was part of an elaborate sham for the benefit of the American public:
---------------The rods were being 'found' by the very man who had submitted them for testing 8 days earlier
---------------The WC testimony taker contrived his arrival at 275 for the first curtain rod.

Welcome to the CT community, Mr Nickerson! 

Jenner began with #270 with the known numbers of the two curtain rods in mind. There's nothing funny or conspiratorial about it. You are attempting to inflate this into something it's not and you're looking like a complete fool in the process.

[Tim Nickerson]

You are accusing your beloved WC of falsifying the on-the-record receipt of evidence!

How so?

[Tim Nickerson]

That?s quite possibly the silliest speculation I?ve ever seen on any aspect of the case.

Oh really? Let's see you come up with something better then.