Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 144993 times)

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: A straight line
« Reply #96 on: February 18, 2018, 04:09:50 PM »
Advertisement


Hargis drove into the debris field as it descended. That means it must have been forward of Hargis (ie: it was expelled from the front of Kennedy's skull, just like the Z-film shows it was).

Jerry, if the debris was from the back of JFK's head would Hargis still have driven into it?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #96 on: February 18, 2018, 04:09:50 PM »


Offline Sean Kneringer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: A straight line
« Reply #97 on: February 18, 2018, 05:42:15 PM »
A bullet passing downward through Kennedy's throat would have necessarily hit some part of Connally's body, so if not near the right shoulder blade, then where?










Offline Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: A straight line
« Reply #98 on: February 18, 2018, 08:21:12 PM »
A bullet passing downward through Kennedy's throat would have necessarily hit some part of Connally's body, so if not near the right shoulder blade, then where?









     Remember, there is a Back Rest on Gov Connally's jump seat.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #98 on: February 18, 2018, 08:21:12 PM »


Offline Sean Kneringer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: A straight line
« Reply #99 on: February 18, 2018, 08:55:55 PM »
     Remember, there is a Back Rest on Gov Connally's jump seat.

Right. Despite the limo being inspected with a fine tooth comb, the FBI and SS somehow missed a bullet hole in the jump seat.  ::)

Offline Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: A straight line
« Reply #100 on: February 18, 2018, 09:22:48 PM »
Right. Despite the limo being inspected with a fine tooth comb, the FBI and SS somehow missed a bullet hole in the jump seat.  ::)

It was a hypothetical question being posed. Numerous JFK Specials attempting to replicate the SBT have Resulted in that shot/bullet going into & or bouncing off of the Limo Dash Board.
Was the Limo "fine tooth comb" inspection you are referring to the FBI inspection conducted Hours After the assassination? If so, they did a Horrible job. They examined an Altered Crime Scene. Just look at the photos they took. The Limo Sun Visors are DOWN in all of their photos. This was Not the position of the Limo Sun Visors when the Assassination occurred.     
« Last Edit: February 18, 2018, 09:26:49 PM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #100 on: February 18, 2018, 09:22:48 PM »


Offline Sean Kneringer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: A straight line
« Reply #101 on: February 18, 2018, 09:39:21 PM »
  It was a hypothetical question being posed. Numerous JFK Specials attempting to replicate the SBT have Resulted in that shot/bullet going into & or bouncing off of the Limo Dash Board.
  Was the Limo "fine tooth comb" inspection you are referring to the FBI inspection conducted Hours After the assassination? If so, they did a Horrible job. They examined an Altered Crime Scene.

Uh huh. Did the guy with the bucket at Parkland also make a bullet hole disappear?

Quote
Just look at the photos they took. The Limo Sun Visors are DOWN in all of their photos. This was Not the position of the Limo Sun Visors when the Assassination occurred.
 

So what? You don't think they looked behind the visors? Why take a photo of something that wasn't damaged.

Offline Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: A straight line
« Reply #102 on: February 18, 2018, 09:53:21 PM »
Uh huh. Did the guy with the bucket at Parkland also make a bullet hole disappear?
 

So what? You don't think they looked behind the visors? Why take a photo of something that wasn't damaged.

Do You believe the FBI KNOWINGLY photographed an Altered Crime Scene? If the FBI KNOWINGLY did this, what would be the purpose of doing so? (Other than Hiding pertinent Evidence from being retained for Posterity?)

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1402
    • SPMLaw
Re: A straight line
« Reply #103 on: February 20, 2018, 06:39:52 PM »
I borrowed this photo from another thread.



Just above the box in the window there are three cars in three lanes....

The car in the center lane seems to be in roughly the same position where JFK's limo was when the shots were fired.

How does a bullet fired from this window and travelling in a straight downward line, passing through Kennedy's back and throat, end up hitting Connally?

Any suggestions?
The holes in JFK's jacket, shirt, back and throat as well as the abrasion on the left side of the tie knot indicate that the bullet passed through JFK on a right to left angle.   There was no indication in the car that the bullet went on to strike anything in the car with significant force.  So, if it exited JFK with any significant velocity, which is almost certain, it must have struck something other than the car.  That leaves JBC was the only possible object that was struck by the bullet that exited JFK.

But that does not lead to the SBT. 

One of the many problems with the SBT is that the right to left angle was about 10-12 degrees depending on where the car was when the first shot occurred. The witness and photographic evidence is pretty consistent that the first shot was after z190 and before z202 and that it struck JFK.  At z197, the right-to-left angle was 12 degrees. That means that over the approximately 24 inches between JFK's neck and the plane of the jump seat-back behind Gov. Connally, the bullet travelled another 5 inches farther left. It is not likely or, in my view even possible, that the bullet, traveling in a straight line after leaving JFK struck Gov. Connally in the right armpit. 
« Last Edit: February 20, 2018, 06:42:24 PM by Andrew Mason »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #103 on: February 20, 2018, 06:39:52 PM »