Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 164230 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11016
Re: A straight line
« Reply #344 on: March 20, 2018, 10:22:54 PM »
Advertisement
The problem could be that what you believe could well be wrong.

In Wesley's universe, picking a belief is a virtue in and of itself.  Even if you don't have any good reason for picking it.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #344 on: March 20, 2018, 10:22:54 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11016
Re: A straight line
« Reply #345 on: March 20, 2018, 10:24:22 PM »
Stories:

Johnson was so mean he once tied a stick of dynamite to a dog. It was only by luck that the dog ran away from him and not toward him.

Johnson was so mean he once locked himself and a kid into a small room, produced a grenade and pulled the pin. It was only by luck that the grenade malfunctioned and failed to explode.

For some people, I don?t think that point is ever reached. The more lurid the story the more believable it is.

So now your skepticism finally kicks in when it's something you don't want to believe.  Is that how it works?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11016
Re: A straight line
« Reply #346 on: March 20, 2018, 10:27:56 PM »
If it implicates Oswald they have this incredible - insuperable - standard of proof; if it implicates anyone else they just go with it.

You have that exactly backwards.  Where Oswald is concerned you have this incredible, insufferable, weak standard of proof.  You'll go with anything -- even ridiculous things like "he left his wedding ring behind".

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #346 on: March 20, 2018, 10:27:56 PM »


Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: A straight line
« Reply #347 on: March 21, 2018, 03:38:01 PM »
Please show us the Dallas Police Department file that says that McClellan and Harrison never gave Darby the real latent palm print from the TSBD 6th floor.

Please show us the Dallas Police Department file that says that McClellan and Harrison never gave Darby the real latent palm print from the TSBD 6th floor.
[/quote]


Please show us where it says they did give Darby a latent palm print? Because John they gave Darby two prints that were "left little finger prints" that's why.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7613
Re: A straight line
« Reply #348 on: March 21, 2018, 05:51:58 PM »
Please show us the Dallas Police Department file that says that McClellan and Harrison never gave Darby the real latent palm print from the TSBD 6th floor.


Please show us where it says they did give Darby a latent palm print? Because John they gave Darby two prints that were "left little finger prints" that's why.

So just because something isn't in the files, or perhaps you simply couldn't find it, in your mind, somehow becomes evidence of something not having happened?

Amazing.... simply amazing!

Btw, if you now claim something isn't in the DPD files, what exactly did you want me to look up?

From the Dallas Police Department Martin. Look it up. I did.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2018, 05:54:38 PM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #348 on: March 21, 2018, 05:51:58 PM »


Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: A straight line
« Reply #349 on: March 21, 2018, 07:07:44 PM »
So just because something isn't in the files, or perhaps you simply couldn't find it, in your mind, somehow becomes evidence of something not having happened?

Amazing.... simply amazing!

Btw, if you now claim something isn't in the DPD files, what exactly did you want me to look up?

Martin, I was just responding to John. John's statement about the DPD was pointless.  The only unidentified latent print was a "palm print".  The only prints given to Darby by McClellan and Harrison were left, little finger prints of Wallace. And they were not found in the TSBD. It was all a sham. Not many serious conspiracy people even believe the Mac Wallace\LBJ theory.

"The cartons. Using the silver nitrate method, the FBI developed nine identifiable latent fingerprints and four identifiable latent palmprints on Box A, seven identifiable fingerprints and two identifiable palmprints on Box B, and two identifiable fingerprints and one identifiable palmprint on Box C. One of the fingerprints on Box A was identified as the right index fingerprint of Lee Harvey Oswald, and one of the palmprints on Box A was identified as the left palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald. All the remaining prints on Box A were the palmprints of R. L. Studebaker, a Dallas police officer, and Forest L. Lucy, an FBI clerk, who shipped the cartons from Dallas to the FBI Laboratory in Washington, D. C. and fingerprints of Detective Studebaker. All but one of the fingerprints on Box B belonged to Studebaker and Lucy and one palmprint was that of Studebaker. The fingerprints on Box C were those of Studebaker and Lucy and the palmprint was Studebaker's. One palmprint on Box B was unidentified."

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7613
Re: A straight line
« Reply #350 on: March 21, 2018, 07:21:15 PM »

Martin, I was just responding to John. John's statement about the DPD was pointless.  The only unidentified latent print was a "palm print".  The only prints given to Darby by McClellan and Harrison were left, little finger prints of Wallace. And they were not found in the TSBD. It was all a sham. Not many serious conspiracy people even believe the Mac Wallace\LBJ theory.

"The cartons. Using the silver nitrate method, the FBI developed nine identifiable latent fingerprints and four identifiable latent palmprints on Box A, seven identifiable fingerprints and two identifiable palmprints on Box B, and two identifiable fingerprints and one identifiable palmprint on Box C. One of the fingerprints on Box A was identified as the right index fingerprint of Lee Harvey Oswald, and one of the palmprints on Box A was identified as the left palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald. All the remaining prints on Box A were the palmprints of R. L. Studebaker, a Dallas police officer, and Forest L. Lucy, an FBI clerk, who shipped the cartons from Dallas to the FBI Laboratory in Washington, D. C. and fingerprints of Detective Studebaker. All but one of the fingerprints on Box B belonged to Studebaker and Lucy and one palmprint was that of Studebaker. The fingerprints on Box C were those of Studebaker and Lucy and the palmprint was Studebaker's. One palmprint on Box B was unidentified."

Martin, I was just responding to John.

So what? This is a public forum.

John's statement about the DPD was pointless.

It wasn't a statement. It was a question and it certainly wasn't pointless since you had told me to search the DPD files for something you knew wasn't there.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11016
Re: A straight line
« Reply #351 on: March 21, 2018, 08:16:31 PM »
Please show us the Dallas Police Department file that says that McClellan and Harrison never gave Darby the real latent palm print from the TSBD 6th floor.


Please show us where it says they did give Darby a latent palm print?

Seriously?  You're shifting the burden again?

Quote
Because John they gave Darby two prints that were "left little finger prints" that's why.

Did you find that in the DPD files too?
« Last Edit: March 21, 2018, 08:18:13 PM by John Iacoletti »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #351 on: March 21, 2018, 08:16:31 PM »