Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 141889 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 834
Re: A straight line
« Reply #496 on: April 06, 2018, 02:50:24 AM »
Advertisement
You got an angle of 12 degrees from looking at an autopsy photo? Really? Which one? How exactly did you come up with 12 degrees? Did you not understand what I posted?

The image that you posted was an axial view of T1. The single bullet passed through above the level of T1. Find an axial view of a C7 image and then try to make a case.

Lame! 2 inches right of the spine. :D
« Last Edit: April 06, 2018, 02:56:57 AM by Jack Trojan »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #496 on: April 06, 2018, 02:50:24 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: A straight line
« Reply #497 on: April 06, 2018, 02:58:54 AM »
Lame! 2 inches right of the spine. :D

Right. 2 inches to the right of the spine. However, that alone doesn't give us the lateral angle of trajectory.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 834
Re: A straight line
« Reply #498 on: April 06, 2018, 03:04:59 AM »
Right. 2 inches to the right of the spine. However, that alone doesn't give us the lateral angle of trajectory.

It sure as hell does. It gives us the EXACT lateral (pitch) angle of trajectory. We just need to determine where JFK was on Elm relative to the SN when the MB struck him.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #498 on: April 06, 2018, 03:04:59 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: A straight line
« Reply #499 on: April 06, 2018, 03:11:01 AM »
It sure as hell does. It gives us the EXACT lateral (pitch) angle of trajectory. We just need to determine where JFK was on Elm relative to the SN when the MB struck him.

It sure as hell does not. On its own, it tells us nothing at all about the lateral angle of trajectory.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 834
Re: A straight line
« Reply #500 on: April 06, 2018, 03:13:31 AM »
It sure as hell does not. On its own, it tells us nothing at all about the lateral angle of trajectory.

Are you serial? Admit it, you don't know what you're talking about, do you?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #500 on: April 06, 2018, 03:13:31 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: A straight line
« Reply #501 on: April 06, 2018, 03:25:52 AM »
Are you serial? Admit it, you don't know what you're talking about, do you?

Jack,  why don't you, as our resident physicist/photogammatrist, explain to the rest of us here how the entry wound being 2 inches to the right of the spine gives the EXACT lateral (pitch) angle of trajectory? Go ahead and dazzle us.

Offline Steve Taylor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: A straight line
« Reply #502 on: April 06, 2018, 03:48:07 PM »
Humes says the back wound was 2" right of the spine.  According to SBT, this bullet then exited midline in the neck.  That's 2" displacement for about 6" forward.  By the time it moves 24" more, to the plane of Connally's back, it should have displaced 8" to the left of JFK's neck.  In my opinion, there is no way this could hit Connally on the right side.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: A straight line
« Reply #503 on: April 06, 2018, 05:14:51 PM »
Humes says the back wound was 2" right of the spine.  According to SBT, this bullet then exited midline in the neck.  That's 2" displacement for about 6" forward.  By the time it moves 24" more, to the plane of Connally's back, it should have displaced 8" to the left of JFK's neck.  In my opinion, there is no way this could hit Connally on the right side.

That seems like an intelligent and rational conclusion......

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #503 on: April 06, 2018, 05:14:51 PM »