Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 144988 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: A straight line
« Reply #80 on: February 08, 2018, 10:21:42 PM »
Advertisement
"14"cm below the Mastoid Process.
Just like on the face sheet.
Another conspiracy theory bites the dust.

Are you claiming that you can read the markings on the ruler in the original photo?  What does superimposing a different ruler over the photo prove?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #80 on: February 08, 2018, 10:21:42 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: A straight line
« Reply #81 on: February 08, 2018, 10:37:22 PM »
So what's the problem with Bill admitting he mistakenly posted a Visual Aid which did Not reflect his Opinion? Your rushing to his aid should Not be necessary.
<facepalm>

What you call a "visual aid" is called a Youtube thumbnail.  Something which Bill had no control over.  Did you actually click on the
"visual aid" to see what would happen?

As for the video itself:

Dale Myers.  LOL.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: A straight line
« Reply #82 on: February 08, 2018, 11:21:06 PM »
Are you claiming that you can read the markings on the ruler in the original photo?  What does superimposing a different ruler over the photo prove?
YAWN, not this crap again!

Quote
Are you claiming that you can read the markings on the ruler in the original photo?

It's a standard 30cm ruler.



Quote
What does superimposing a different ruler over the photo prove?

You can't be this dense, your original post asked why I "slapped 14" on the ruler so I proved my case.



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #82 on: February 08, 2018, 11:21:06 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: A straight line
« Reply #83 on: February 08, 2018, 11:36:23 PM »
It's a standard 30cm ruler.

How do you know?

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: A straight line
« Reply #84 on: February 08, 2018, 11:52:34 PM »
How do you know?
Have another look at the ruler! DUH!

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #84 on: February 08, 2018, 11:52:34 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: A straight line
« Reply #85 on: February 09, 2018, 12:10:33 AM »
Have another look at the ruler! DUH!

Duh indeed.  What tells you this is a "standard 30 cm ruler"?


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: A straight line
« Reply #86 on: February 09, 2018, 12:57:42 AM »
Duh indeed.  What tells you this is a "standard 30 cm ruler"?



Quote
Duh indeed.

LOL, It's right in front of your face, look harder!

Quote
What tells you this is a "standard 30 cm ruler"?

It's really not difficult, as I said, look harder.

JohnM

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: A straight line
« Reply #87 on: February 09, 2018, 02:48:27 AM »
I borrowed this photo from another thread.



Just above the box in the window there are three cars in three lanes....

The car in the center lane seems to be in roughly the same position where JFK's limo was when the shots were fired.

How does a bullet fired from this window and travelling in a straight downward line, passing through Kennedy's back and throat, end up hitting Connally?

Any suggestions?

Martin, according to the ITEK Corp. Film and Photographic Analysis of the assassination, the lateral angle of trajectory was 11.5? +/-1? right to left, relative to the midline of the limo. They measured Connally to be positioned 6.4" +/-2.2" inboard of Kennedy.

How does a bullet passing through Kennedy's back/neck and throat not end up hitting Connally?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #87 on: February 09, 2018, 02:48:27 AM »