A straight line

[Tim Nickerson]

Tim, I think you meant don't find people guilty or innocent?

They only determine whether there's sufficient evidence - "probable cause" - to bring charges against someone.

I do find this interesting: LBJ was a bad man therefore he killed JFK.

What did LBJ do after becoming president? He passed civil rights (two of them), a voting rights bill, a fair housing bill, poverty programs, he ended Operation Mongoose and the covert war on Cuba.....

Yes, as Caro documented in his books - and as he himself said - LBJ was a horrible, despicable person. Nobody denies that. But that is not evidence of his involvement in the assassination. Besides, he would have to have underlings pull off this act of treason. The conspiracy crowd likes to cry Hoover! and LBJ! and other awful people as if that is sufficient alone to prove their involvement. Sorry, that's not enough.

Anyway, LBJ's post assassination acts are hardly those of right wing militarists who killed JFK to promote their malevolent agenda.

Steve, I edited my post four minutes before this post of yours.

[Tim Nickerson]

You'd better send an e mail to Viewzone, Tim.

What for? That article is full of errors. I'm not going to waste my time correcting every damn fool on the internet.

[Tim Nickerson]

Tim I am sure at the time Darby said that, that the two prints matched. I'm not disputing that. The only latent print found in the sniper's nest was a palm print collected by the DPD. There was not a latent print of a "little finger print" found. It was all faked by McClellan and Harrison. When they gave the prints to Darby he was not told what or who the belonged to.

Wesley, my point is that Darby wasn't given an actual print of Wallace's to compare with his known prints. He was given a photocopy of Wallace's fingerprint.

[Wesley Johnson]

Translation: I am too lazy or unable to support the claims I make... Pathetic

You claimed;

which has nothing to do with what's in the DPD files or not.

which has nothing to do with what's in the DPD files or not.

Who is being lazy? You are. Are you saying that the Dallas Police Department did not collect a "latent palm print" from the area around the 6th floor sniper's window?

[Wesley Johnson]

Wesley, my point is that Darby wasn't given an actual print of Wallace's to compare with his known prints. He was given a photocopy of Wallace's fingerprint.

Yes I understand. My only point is, there was never a "latent finger print" found at the sniper's nest, it was a "latent palm print" and Darby did not know that because McClellan and Harrison played him. I understand your point.

[Martin Weidmann]

which has nothing to do with what's in the DPD files or not.

Who is being lazy? You are. Are you saying that the Dallas Police Department did not collect a "latent palm print" from the area around the 6th floor sniper's window?

No, I am saying that you make claims that you can't or won't support.

I'm not going to search the DPD files to check your claim!

[Wesley Johnson]

No, I am saying that you make claims that you can't or won't support.

I'm not going to search the DPD files to check your claim!

I'm not going to search the DPD files to check your claim!


Why not? I've researched the conspiracy buffs crap. I use to believe there was a conspiracy Martin, until more and more theories came out that conflicted. I stopped believing there was a conspiracy when I read Lifton's farce. How do you know if I can't support what I claim if you don't research it? Who is being closed minded Martin? 

[Wesley Johnson]

This means that he can't cite any evidence. What else is new?

And this from the king of the fence walkers and BS artists.