Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The preponderance of the evidence  (Read 52137 times)

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #280 on: April 08, 2019, 06:56:01 AM »
Advertisement
Tell us how many of your 'lots of people' conducted 25,000 interviews
Most of the interviews were used as filler to make their final report look as large a possible for their two biggest fans, you and Ross.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #280 on: April 08, 2019, 06:56:01 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #281 on: April 08, 2019, 10:39:13 AM »
Where did I say that..

What else did you mean by this;

Tell us how many of your 'lots of people' conducted 25,000 interviews

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #282 on: April 08, 2019, 08:18:49 PM »
Most of the interviews were used as filler to make their final report look as large a possible for their two biggest fans, you and Ross.

Yes.  It's the same reason that Bugliosi lists "53 pieces of evidence", most of which aren't evidence for anything.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #282 on: April 08, 2019, 08:18:49 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #283 on: April 09, 2019, 07:54:38 AM »
What else did you mean by this;

I meant what I said the first time: 25,000 interviews were undertaken. You wouldn't be assuming something, now would you?

Oh, btw can you point out just who your apparently small cadre of interviewers are that might render null and void the 25,000? Perhaps ambulance & Jimmy Jones chaser Mark Lane for instance, who tried to manipulate 'The Divine Miss M' but instead got his arse handed to him? That quality?
« Last Edit: April 09, 2019, 07:59:27 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #284 on: April 09, 2019, 09:40:03 AM »
I meant what I said the first time: 25,000 interviews were undertaken. You wouldn't be assuming something, now would you?

Oh, btw can you point out just who your apparently small cadre of interviewers are that might render null and void the 25,000? Perhaps ambulance & Jimmy Jones chaser Mark Lane for instance, who tried to manipulate 'The Divine Miss M' but instead got his arse handed to him? That quality?
25,000? ha ha ha ha ha  That's funny are sure it wasn't 50,000?  Always an even number, right?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #284 on: April 09, 2019, 09:40:03 AM »


Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #285 on: April 09, 2019, 09:48:36 AM »
Yes.  It's the same reason that Bugliosi lists "53 pieces of evidence", most of which aren't evidence for anything.
I don't know why Chapman doesn't use Bugliosi for his last name.  Vincent had one illegitimate kid

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #286 on: April 09, 2019, 01:14:50 PM »
Oh, btw can you point out just who your apparently small cadre of interviewers are that might render null and void the 25,000?

Who said the interviews were null and void?

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #287 on: April 09, 2019, 02:39:04 PM »
I meant what I said the first time: 25,000 interviews were undertaken. You wouldn't be assuming something, now would you?

Oh, btw can you point out just who your apparently small cadre of interviewers are that might render null and void the 25,000? Perhaps ambulance & Jimmy Jones chaser Mark Lane for instance, who tried to manipulate 'The Divine Miss M' but instead got his arse handed to him? That quality?

I meant what I said the first time: 25,000 interviews were undertaken. You wouldn't be assuming something, now would you?

I don't need to assume anything. It's pretty obvious what you said, just that it is obvious that you are now trying to distance yourself from the stupidity of it.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #287 on: April 09, 2019, 02:39:04 PM »