Bugliosi's 53 pieces of evidence. And WCR link.

[Martin Weidmann]

Dear John,
Some thoughts regarding your response to my meme in the thread.

It was not in reply to your original post, although I suspect you thought it was. If it was I would have posted I as a reply to yours....it was not.

My first thought to your response was that you got out of the bed the wrong side this morning. I imagine you (as I) are disappointed at the realisation of loss of years of posts by forum members. A lot of valuable information gone forever it seems, although I suspect that you have alternative means of sourcing some of the information posted by you (and others) by way of some form of backup. I have but by pure chance and most of my original research posted here is lost.....I?m thinking of the analysis of the DPD radio logs and movements of police after the shots, the NAA relating to the Walker bullet and Oswald?s employment at JCS. Oh well....we live and learn.

I must admit I was taken aback at your response and thought it harsh and accusatory (as Martin did). I read and post at this forum to share and learn. When I have been proven to be in error I have had no problem in admitting so.  I was considering not registering again after the attack but decided to rejoin. Perhaps I might reconsider and leave the kitchen, not because of the heat but because of the quality of the dishes served. Particularly their regurgitation.

I would appreciate honest answers to both of my previous questions, not simply with another question.

Regards
Colin

Colin,

I think you can wait for a very long time before you get an honest answer from John Mytton to any of your questions.

[Colin Crow]

Dear John,
Some thoughts regarding your response to my meme in the thread.

It was not in reply to your original post, although I suspect you thought it was. If it was I would have posted I as a reply to yours....it was not.

My first thought to your response was that you got out of the bed the wrong side this morning. I imagine you (as I) are disappointed at the realisation of loss of years of posts by forum members. A lot of valuable information gone forever it seems, although I suspect that you have alternative means of sourcing some of the information posted by you (and others) by way of some form of backup. I have but by pure chance and most of my original research posted here is lost.....I?m thinking of the analysis of the DPD radio logs and movements of police after the shots, the NAA relating to the Walker bullet and Oswald?s employment at JCS. Oh well....we live and learn.

I must admit I was taken aback at your response and thought it harsh and accusatory (as Martin did). I read and post at this forum to share and learn. When I have been proven to be in error I have had no problem in admitting so.  I was considering not registering again after the attack but decided to rejoin. Perhaps I might reconsider and leave the kitchen, not because of the heat but because of the quality of the dishes served. Particularly their regurgitation.

I would appreciate honest answers to both of my previous questions, not simply with another question.

Regards
Colin

Sadly it appears that Martin was a better judge than me and it appears that John has far better things to do than prepare a reply to my post.

[Ross Lidell]

"Stone the crows": Colin's back.

[Bob Prudhomme]

I never accused Colin of anything, retract this comment or I will take this further.



JohnM

Easy, big boy. Remember what the doctor told you about getting worked up.

[John Iacoletti]

So for a refresher take a look at the accumulated evidence by Bugliosi.

"Evidence".  LOL.  This is what Bugliosi and Mytton call "evidence" of murder:

- Leaving his wedding ring behind at the Paine house
- Not reading the newspaper in the domino room that morning
- Going to the second floor to get a Coke when he preferred Dr. Pepper
- Not being chatty with the cab driver
- Showing reporters his handcuffed hands
- Marina thinking his eyes looked guilty
- Leaving his blue jacket in the domino room
- Leaving a clipboard on the sixth floor

[John Iacoletti]

Besides the Mountain of Evidence against Oswald

LOL

the most important evidence which has never been refuted

LOL

is that Oswald who had no alibi

Neither did at least 5 other people in the TSBD alone.

was seen with a rifle on the 6th floor,

By whom?

And let's not forget that upon a search of the same floor Oswald's rifle

LOL

which he ordered,

Unproven.

received

Unproven.

and was photographed with

Unproven.

was found with his prints

Unproven.

and fibers which by prohibitive probability came from the shirt Oswald was wearing.

"prohibitive probability" is Bugliosi-ese for "similar".

Then Oswald Killed a Cop

Unproven.

Claims aren't evidence.

[Paul May]

My posts use the actual evidence. I quote it and put links to it. Why do you avoid the evidence?

Sure, I offer opinion occasionally, but for the part I use the actual evidence. You use nothing but your opinion.

To prove any form of conspiracy exists you need evidence to support that specific conspiracy. Be very specific.  Using your own words that YOU use "actual evidence", post this "actual evidence" for ANY conspiracy.  Put up or stfu. Your choice.

[John Mytton]

Neither did at least 5 other people in the TSBD alone.

If one of these 5 or more people was tied to the rifle which was found on the 6th floor then you could have an argument, well?



JohnM