Buell's "off" day (aka: oh yeah)

[John Iacoletti]

That isn't what I said.

It most certainly is.  This is what you said:

The context is a sworn affidavit of 11/22/63 stating clearly that he "did not see LHO after about 11:00 AM today." That is either true or a lie. If it is true then his statement in the 7/13/2013 interview is a lie. And if the affidavit is not true, then it is a lie. Either way he is a liar.

What you never explained is why you are assuming a non-truth must be a "blatant and intentional lie".

[Charles Collins]

It most certainly is.  This is what you said:

What you never explained is why you are assuming a non-truth must be a "blatant and intentional lie".

You are generalizing. I am specifically talking about this case.

[John Iacoletti]

I stand corrected. Coming from the direction of the rear exit is what I was thinking. Thanks for the correction. 

[John Iacoletti]

You are generalizing. I am specifically talking about this case.

Why are you equivocating?  What about this specific case enables you to determine that Frazier was ""blatantly and intentionally lying"?

[Charles Collins]

Why are you equivocating?  What about this specific case enables you to determine that Frazier was ""blatantly and intentionally lying"?

What makes you think that he wasn’t?

[John Iacoletti]

What makes you think that he wasn’t?

You're the one who made the claim -- stop trying to shift the burden.  I agree with you that at face value, one of those statements has to be untrue.  It doesn't necessarily follow that one of those statements is a "blatant and intentional lie".

[John Mytton]

It doesn't necessarily follow that one of those statements is a "blatant and intentional lie".

Yeah, kinda like Marina's statements, huh?

JohnM

[Charles Collins]

You're the one who made the claim -- stop trying to shift the burden.  I agree with you that at face value, one of those statements has to be untrue.  It doesn't necessarily follow that one of those statements is a "blatant and intentional lie".

Liar = teller of untruths

blatant = obvious

intentional = knowing

Which of these do you not understand?

Edit:

I backed up my claim with evidence (affidavit and video of interview). That seems to sufficient to everyone but you. If you are claiming that my claim is wrong. Then at least tell me what the heck you think is wrong with it.