Just awaiting for the 'Prove it was Oswald's rifle' shenanigans.
I proved that it wasn't, without shenanigans. But if you'd like to try pulling your own shenanigans, I'll gladly wait. Just don't forget to provide photo evidence that can debunk mine. And good luck with that.
In the mean time, what else might Oswald swallower try to say...? "But Oswald's finger prints were found on the boxes."
Ah yes, you mean his finger prints were found where he worked... handling boxes? Well then... that certainly spells out his guilt. Just what kind of dumb ass cops & FBI agents were on the case? How stupid obvious was the frame up in this situation... let's just have a look at real shenanigans.
So the police search for finger prints to id an assassin. Why was Oswald, an employee, the only possible suspect? Isn't there something wrong with that picture?
One obvious problem is that finger prints couldn't be identified in 1 day, because they didn't have computer systems capable of that. And yet Oswald was identified as the suspect in less than hour. How could the cops in 1963 have done enough police work to positively ID Oswald, AN EMPLOYEE, as the only suspect? Does that make sense to anyone?
How many other possible suspects were there? How about everyone who worked there for starters. And yet they only zeroed in on Oswald. Why is that?
Page 249 of the WCR claims:
In addition to Oswald's print, a total of 25 identifiable prints were found on 4 boxes near the window of the 6th floor.
The Commission determined that none of the warehouse employees who might have customarily handled the boxes left prints which could be identified.
SAY WHAT?? READ THAT AGAIN!
NONE OF THE OTHER EMPLOYEES WHO HANDLED THE BOXES LEFT PRINTS THAT COULD BE IDENTIFIED! So even though Oswald was an employee too, who also handled boxes, none of the other employees left finger prints that could be identified, except him. And no one thought to question that? You'd have to be a special kind of stupid to buy that. But for the cops and FBI to buy it too? Let's continue. Same page.
All but 1 of the 25 definitely identifiable prints were the prints of 2 persons--an FBI employee and a member of the Dallas Police Department. HOLY spombleprofglidnoctobuns!! LET'S READ THAT AGAIN! BECAUSE 24 OF THE 25 PRINTS ALL BELONGED TO 1 FBI AGENT & 1 COP.
One identifiable palmprint was not identified. Say what? READ IT AGAIN!
ONE IDENTIFIABLE PRINT WAS NOT IDENTIFIED. Well... why not?
Why would the police & FBI fail to pursue the identify of an unknown print at a crime scene? Which part of that isn't stupid as all hell? That shouldn't make sense to anyone with the slightest bit of common sense? Because that means there was a possible suspect, besides Oswald. How do they know he wasn't working with anyone? Wasn't important enough to find out? How the hell could the FBI & Police not care about that?
Unless they were the ones framing Oswald. Is that a possibility? Look at my evidence for the 2 rifles. Not only was it possible, it's exactly what happened. And you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. You just have to stop swallowing all the nonsensical bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns that doesn't make any sense at all.
