CT's, how did Oswald's rifle end up on the 6th floor?

[Charles Collins]

Indeed.... I'll be back every time you prove you're a hypocrite

Let’s see, you’re done but then you’re not done?

Nothing hypocritical about that, is there?

[Martin Weidmann]

Let’s see, you’re done but then you’re not done?

Nothing hypocritical about that, is there?

No. People can change their mind. But I understand why you want to change the subject.....

I said I was done because I couldn't fix stupid. 

You provoked my return to the topic by showing it was also hypocrisy. Did you really think I would let you get away with that?

[Charles Collins]

No. People can change their mind. But I understand why you want to change the subject.....

I said I was done because I couldn't fix stupid. 

You provoked my return to the topic by showing it was also hypocrisy. Did you really think I would let you get away with that?

Your opinion doesn’t interest me.

[Martin Weidmann]

Your opinion doesn’t interest me.

Of course it doesn't… but that doesn't diminish the validity of the opinion. It just shows how closed your mind really is.

[Charles Collins]

Of course it doesn't… but that doesn't diminish the validity of the opinion. It just shows how closed your mind really is.

Most of your opinions are only attacks on the people who disagree with you. Or you trying to spin statements around to attempt to make it appear someone said something that they didn’t say. Or you trying to generalize a statement about something that is specific. Or you trying to take something out of context and make it into something that fits your fantasy. I have shown you these things to no avail. Why do you think I should be interested in nonsense?

[Martin Weidmann]

Most of your opinions are only attacks on the people who disagree with you. Or you trying to spin statements around to attempt to make it appear someone said something that they didn’t say. Or you trying to generalize a statement about something that is specific. Or you trying to take something out of context and make it into something that fits your fantasy. I have shown you these things to no avail. Why do you think I should be interested in nonsense?

Most of your opinions are only attacks on the people who disagree with you.

No. You have that the wrong way around. I ask hard questions you can't answer, so you hide behind "the bad man attacked me" nonsense.

Try having an honest debate for once, instead of just being defensive all the time. You may find it refreshing.

Or you trying to spin statements around to attempt to make it appear someone said something that they didn’t say.

Nope again. That's what you are doing  You are trying to put words in Henry Wade's mouth, which the real evidence conclusively shows he could never have said at the time when you claimed he said it, and all you have to back up your opinion is a vague newspaper article and some quotes from a book.

Or you trying to generalize a statement about something that is specific.

I don't even know what you are rambling on about here....

Or you trying to take something out of context and make it into something that fits your fantasy

Nothing is being taken out of context. At least not by me. A newspaper article and quotes from memory long after the fact don't offer the so-called context you keep going on about

I have shown you these things to no avail. 

All you have shown me is that you are more than happy to take a newspaper article and some quotes from memory (that fit with your theory) as gospel while at the same time ignoring under oath testimony from Latona and Day which combined demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that what you claim simply could not have happened. And then you say I'm living in a fantasy world..... really?
 
Btw, in this one post alone you falsely claim that I (1) attack people who disagree with me (2) try to spin statements around (3) try to generalize statements and (4)  try to take something out of context..... and I'm the one attacking you? Are you for real?

Why do you think I should be interested in nonsense?

Indeed, so why are you desperately clinging to your absurd claim and ignoring actual evidence?

[Charles Collins]

Most of your opinions are only attacks on the people who disagree with you.

No. You have that the wrong way around. I ask hard questions you can't answer, so you hide behind "the bad man attacked me" nonsense.

Try having an honest debate for once, instead of just being defense all the time. You may find it refreshing.

Or you trying to spin statements around to attempt to make it appear someone said something that they didn’t say.

Nope again. That's what you are doing  You are trying to put words in Henry Wade's mouth, which the real evidence conclusively shows he could never have said at the time when you claimed he said it, and all you have to back up your opinion is a vague newspaper article and some quotes from a book.

Or you trying to generalize a statement about something that is specific.

I don't even know what you are rambling on about here....

Or you trying to take something out of context and make it into something that fits your fantasy

Nothing is being taken out of context. At least not by me. A newspaper article and quotes from memory long after the fact don't offer the so-called context you keep going on about

I have shown you these things to no avail. 

All you have shown me is that you are more than happy to take a newspaper article and some quotes from memory (that fit with your theory) as gospel while at the same time ignoring under oath testimony from Latona and Day which combined demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that what you claim simply could not have happened. And then you say I'm living in a fantasy world..... really?
 
Btw, in this one post alone you falsely claim that I (1) attack people who disagree with me (2) trying to spin statements around (3) trying to generalize statements and (4)  trying to take something out of context..... and I'm the one attacking you? Are you for real?

Why do you think I should be interested in nonsense?

Indeed, so why are you desperately clinging to your absurd claim and ignoring actual evidence?

If someone here has something to say that pertains to the JFK assassination and is reasonable and I agree with them, no matter which side of the fence they are on, I have no problem saying so. I don't recall ever seeing anything like that from you.

[Martin Weidmann]

If someone here has something to say that pertains to the JFK assassination and is reasonable and I agree with them, no matter which side of the fence they are on, I have no problem saying so. I don't recall ever seeing anything like that from you.

That only means you not only have a bad recollection but also feel the need to attack me again, as you have nothing to dispute my comments.