CT's, how did Oswald's rifle end up on the 6th floor?

[John Iacoletti]

You can't be Fk'n serious?

They had an eyewitness who saw Oswald kill Tippit.
They had eyewitnesses who saw Oswald at the crime scene.
They had eyewitnesses who saw Oswald with a weapon at the crime scene.
They had eyewitnesses who saw Oswald emptying shells at the crime scene.

No, they had witnesses who picked Oswald out of a biased, unfair lineup or from a mugshot of Oswald.

They had an eyewitness who saw Oswald acting suspiciously leading up to the theater.
They had the box office girl tell them that Oswald didn't buy a ticket.
They had a Police officer who was struck by Oswald.
They had more Police Officers confirm Oswald resisted being questioned.

None of these claims even have anything to do with Tippit.

They had Oswald's revolver, which Oswald used to try and kill more Police officers.

No, they had a revolver that Gerald Hill pulled out of his pocket 2 hours later at the station.  And there's no evidence whatsoever that Oswald "tried to kill more police officers".

[John Mytton]

You do know that Drain disputes this, right?

Do you have the sworn Drain testimony?

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Day testifies that he was ordered to stop processing the evidence, that he did not match Oswald to any prints and that he held back the index card for four days.

Not only that, but the magic partial palmprint arrived separately from all of the other print evidence and two days later.  Why?

[John Mytton]

No, they had witnesses who picked Oswald out of a biased, unfair lineup or from a mugshot of Oswald.

None of these claims even have anything to do with Tippit.

No, they had a revolver that Gerald Hill pulled out of his pocket 2 hours later at the station.  And there's no evidence whatsoever that Oswald "tried to kill more police officers".
JohnM

No, they had witnesses who picked Oswald out of a biased, unfair lineup or from a mugshot of Oswald.

"unfair" LOLOLOL!

No, they had a revolver that Gerald Hill pulled out of his pocket 2 hours later at the station.

Yes, that had a serial number of the same revolver that Oswald ordered. Try again!

And there's no evidence whatsoever that Oswald "tried to kill more police officers".

You can keep dreaming it, but you won't change the evidence.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Huh? The index card shows 5 marks that were transferred from the rifle, the same card that shows Oswald's authenticated palm print.

How do you know these marks were "transferred from the rifle"?  Because of a smudge with numbers on it?

[John Mytton]

.....arrived separately from all of the other print evidence and two days later.  Why?

How does any of that change the evidence that Day testified to taking the Palmprint from Oswald's rifle on the 22nd and that Day's Palmprint Index card shared the same random marks with Oswald's rifle.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Do you have the sworn Drain testimony?

Do you have the sworn Day testimony that he told Drain about the magic partial palmprint?

Also, why did Day refuse to make a written signed statement to the WC about his alleged lifting of the partial palmprint?

[John Mytton]

How do you know these marks were "transferred from the rifle"?  Because of a smudge with numbers on it?

No, because we have the head of the FBI presenting the actual evidence that obviously in it's pristine condition must have been legible.

JohnM