CT's, how did Oswald's rifle end up on the 6th floor?

[John Mytton]

If Oswald is as innocent as you imply then why all the deception and lies?

When and where did John imply that Oswald is innocent?

Are you making stuff up again?

When and where did John imply that Oswald is innocent?

What a stupid question how can I answer a negative?  A more accurate question is, When has John made even 1 post that says that Oswald was guilty of murdering the President or Tippit?

There's a reason that Iacoletti has never backed away from being accused of being Oswald's defence lawyer, that's because he's lives and breathes Oswald, he even had his photo taken alongside Oswald's grave, now that's someone that's dedicated to his client! 

Are you making stuff up again?

I don't have to make up anything, you Kooks here do enough of that to last a lifetime.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

The answer you seek is readily available out there. Why start a thread on it?

I looked and I can't find even 1 person who admits to planting the rifle, then I looked for people who could have known someone who could have planted the rifle and no one said Boo. I looked for people who worked in the depository who could have seen someone with a rifle or a rifle package and guess what, that came up negative too.
But obviously because you said so, you are part of the elite JFK Researcher Squad, so whenever you're ready can you provide the answer?

JohnM

 

[Martin Weidmann]

What a stupid question how can I answer a negative?  A more accurate question is, When has John made even 1 post that says that Oswald was guilty of murdering the President or Tippit?

There's a reason that Iacoletti has never backed away from being accused of being Oswald's defence lawyer, that's because he's lives and breathes Oswald, he even had his photo taken alongside Oswald's grave, now that's someone that's dedicated to his client! 

I don't have to make up anything, you Kooks here do enough of that to last a lifetime.

JohnM

What a stupid question how can I answer a negative? 

What negative would that be?

You claimed that John had implied that Oswald was innocent. I asked you to show where and when he implied that. Could it be you simply can't back up your claim?

A more accurate question is, When has John made even 1 post that says that Oswald was guilty of murdering the President or Tippit?

Talk about stupid questions.....

Why would John (or anybody else for that matter) have to have an opinion about Oswald's guilt or innocence, when he is not sure either way?


There's a reason that Iacoletti has never backed away from being accused of being Oswald's defence lawyer,

And why should he back away from that? Perhaps he understands that that's exactly what you and your ilk want him to do every time you call him Oswald's defence lawyer. To the best of my knowledge, John himself has never claimed he was Oswald's defence lawyer so there is no reason for him to back away from anything.

[John Iacoletti]

This just gets more ridiculous by the day. Do you really believe any of the increasingly desperate nonsense that you spew everyday?

It couldn't be more clear that as part of Kleins record keeping that both coupon and envelope were photographed together.

1. They both have the name A Hidell.
2. They both have the same return address
2. The both have writing attributed to Lee Harvey Oswald.
4. The envelope references Dept 358
5. The coupon references C20-T750, corresponding to an Italian Carcano on the Dept 358 Kleins ad.
6. The amount of $19.95 corresponds to the price for C20-T750 on Dept 358.

Addressed in the new thread you created for the subject.

The amount of the money order which was written by Oswald and received by Kliens is dated the same as the money order and the amount is the total of Oswald's rifle + postage.

..and your evidence that the money order found in Virginia was ever "received by Klein's" would be . . . ?

The amount on the money order doesn't even match the amount written on the coupon.  Oops!

[John Iacoletti]

Semantics suck

So do lying cops.

[John Iacoletti]

What a stupid question how can I answer a negative?

That's not a negative.  You claimed that I implied Oswald was innocent.  When?

  A more accurate question is, When has John made even 1 post that says that Oswald was guilty of murdering the President or Tippit?

So if I don't claim to know he's guilty, then I'm "implying" he's innocent.  Is that how your brain works?  You can either prove he's guilty or not.

[Walt Cakebread]

If Oswald is as innocent as you imply then why all the deception and lies?

When and where did John imply that Oswald is innocent?

Are you making stuff up again?

Please note that the Mannlicher Carcano that is illustrated has BOTTOM SLING swivels...as does the Model 91/38 Carcano seen in the CE 133A photo.

[John Mytton]

That's not a negative.  You claimed that I implied Oswald was innocent.  When?

So if I don't claim to know he's guilty, then I'm "implying" he's innocent.  Is that how your brain works?  You can either prove he's guilty or not.

Yeah I was wrong, your posts don't imply Oswald was innocent they scream from the top of their lungs that Oswald was innocent.




A man is the sum of his actions, of what he has done, of what he can do, Nothing else.
John Galsworthy

So if I don't claim to know he's guilty, then I'm "implying" he's innocent.

Of course, when you go to the lengths of separating evidence into two parts just so you can present what you perceive to be  less incriminating evidence to the court is a stunt only a naive Defence Attorney would try and pull off.

Is that how your brain works?

My brain works!

You can either prove he's guilty or not.

Both the Warren Commission and a decade and a half later the HSCA studied the evidence and concluded that Oswald was guilty, whereas you and the rest of the CT's haven't concluded squat. A jury can only decide a case with evidence and the Magic Unknown Boogeyman who was everywhere but nowhere is simply laughable.

JohnM