John...I dunno about his statements being "subjective," but virtually ALL of them are untrue...but merely reflect the (EXTREMELY FLAWED) Official Narrative. The evidence that the M-C carbine was Oswald's is extremely tenuous. E.g., initially NO PRINTS were found on the weapon (Oswald's or ANYONE'S), Maria's testimony reflected a denial that her husband owned a rifle (and only changed later...apparently after being brow-beaten by fed. agents, who reminded her that her staying in the USA might well be dependent upon her testimony). Incidentally, the Warren Commission legal staff noted that Maria's testimony changed dramatically from time to time, and was NOT reliable! This guy insists that LHO said nothing about being elsewhere than on the sixth floor...an absolute untruth, as Oswald said that he'd been on the first floor (and witnesses corroborated this). The shells found near the shooting of the police officer DID NOT match Oswald's revolver, but were from two diff. handguns. It is patently clear that this guy...along with most "Lone Nutter" nuts, I'm sorry to say-- is "coming from" ("a priori") dogma, not from disinterested analysis of the evidence.
BOTTOM LINE, in American criminal jurisprudence, a suspect is considered innocent, unless proven "beyond a reasonable doubt." The evidence against suspect Oswald was ANYTHING BUT compelling and did NOT meet the usual standard. Effectively, Oswald (post mortem) was subjected to "Star Chamber" justice by the Warren Commission. From Dallas to Washington, LHO was the "fall-guy," and he was very quickly dispatched (murdered) (thus avoiding the very inconvenient possibility of his receiving legal counsel, and MAYBE (half-way) legitimate treatment in court. This MUST NOT be allowed to occur, regardless of whatever else developed. QED.
My best to all here. ; )
