What physics reveals about the JFK event

[Paul May]

https://www.history.com/news/jfk-assassination-grassy-knoll-theory-debunked

[Charles Collins]

https://www.history.com/news/jfk-assassination-grassy-knoll-theory-debunked

(𝒫⇒𝒬)⟺(¬𝒬⇒¬𝒫)

And there you have it. Proof! 🤔

Actually, it is a very interesting article. The science and mathematics are over my head. But the findings make sense. And it is good to see the methods used.

I wonder if anyone has studied what the impacts and explosion, including the impact on the inside of the windshield, would sound like to the nearest bystanders. That and the loud noise of the soda bottle being thrown down near Zapruder probably confused many of them.

[Charles Collins]

Nalli's got another one here:

Sniper Target Tracking Analysis of John F. Kennedy Assassination

Journal of the Association for Crime Scene Reconstruction, Nov 2018 ( Link )

Yes, as despicable as the act was, the choice of how the ambush was set up was very good military tactics.

[Paul May]

The science, while difficult for the layman, taken within context of all physical and ballistic evidence is, IMO one more nail in the coffin of multiple shooters at various venues.

[Michael O'Brian]

https://www.history.com/news/jfk-assassination-grassy-knoll-theory-debunked

The fatal head shot came from the direction of the TSBD no doubt, but it was fired from the Dal Tex and then entered in through one window of the TSBD and exited out of the alleged SN window.
This would still create almost the same trajectory, as it passes in and out of the two 6th floor windows, down onto Elm street.
Greer the KKK lover would have been vital to bring the limo into the line of fire, perhaps at the moment in which he turns around to look in the back,  if this is the exact area the snipers needed to get the shot on target, and if it turns out that a head shot was visible through those arks then this is highly likely to be the firing point for the fatal head shot. 

[John Iacoletti]

Let's say for the sake of argument that we all agree that there was no shooter on the north knoll.

Does that demonstrate that Oswald killed the president?

[John Mytton]

Let's say for the sake of argument that we all agree that there was no shooter on the north knoll.

Yes, that's what the physics experts are saying.

JohnM

[Michael O'Brian]

Let's say for the sake of argument that we all agree that there was no shooter on the north knoll.

Does that demonstrate that Oswald killed the president?

No it does not, and also the fact that both target hitting shots came from behind still does not make him guilty either, in fact the latter makes it more obvious of his innocence and that it was a planned and well thought out set up, and according to Milteers premonition correct on a few counts.