The number one CT nightmare question ...

[John Iacoletti]

You have claimed that Oswald's movements were not important at the moment of the assassination because the conspirators could control all the evidence such as confiscating and manipulating any films or photos taken of Oswald on the street.  Once you have deemed your fantasy conspirators all powerful and ubiquitous then you eliminate the ability to prove Oswald guilty.  It becomes an impossible standard of proof.  For example, Oswald has no credible alibi at the time of the assassination.

Once you insert your subjective word "credible" in there, you reveal that your standard of proof is insufficient.  You dismiss any evidence to the contrary as not being "credible".  At least 6 other people in the TSBD alone have no alibi at the time of the assassination, "credible" or otherwise.

[Thomas Graves]

Does it not even occur to you that somebody can be framed after the fact?

Iacoletti,

Who do you think the evil, evil, evil DPD, CIA and FBI would have framed if Oswald hadn't gone to work that day, or ... gasp ... had been clearly "caught" on film while standing outside during the motorcade?

A different "Alek James Hidell"?

-- MWT 

[John Iacoletti]

"A Hidell" could have been anybody.

[Thomas Graves]

"A Hidell" could have been anybody.

Iacolonetti,

He wouldn't have been nearly that handsome.

Regardless, according to your theory, the bad guys had to not only wait until Oswald and all the other putative Hidells came to work that morning, but hope against hope that at least one of them would stay inside the building and not be seen by any other employees while some guy or gal from the evil, evil, evil CIA was doing the shooting.

LOL

-- MWT 

PS  Why do you naturally assume that evidence implicating Oswald, like the palm print found on the stock of the Carcano, was fabricated?

Do you agree with Trump that we live in an evil, evil, evil CIA and FBI-dominated "Deep State," and that Russia's intelligence services are to be preferred to our own?

[John Iacoletti]

Regardless, according to your theory, the bad guys had to not only wait until Oswald and all the other putative Hidells came to work that morning, but hope against hope that at least one of them would stay inside the building and not be seen by any other employees while some guy or gal from the evil, evil, evil CIA was doing the shooting.

That's not my theory, but nice try.

PS  Why do you naturally assume that evidence implicating Oswald, like the palm print found on the stock of the Carcano, was fabricated?

What palm print found on the stock of the Carcano?  All I know about is a partial palm print found a week later on an index card.

[Thomas Graves]

That's not my theory, but nice try.

What palm print found on the stock of the Carcano?  All I know about is a partial palm print found a week later on an index card.

And you automatically assume that it must be bogus, right?

Are you into Film Alteration, too?

-- MWT 

[Thomas Graves]

Iacoletti,

Care to expound on your theory as to how the evil, evil, evil DPD and/or the evil, evil, evil CIA and/or the evil, evil, evil FBI framed Oswald so quickly after-the-fact, not knowing in advance that he'd show up for work that day, and which frame job seems to have involved a "mysto" witness lying when he (allegedly) told Herb Sawyer about the dude he'd seen running away from the back of the building, and Brennan's "observations" during the shooting, and the lyin' descriptions, by people living or working in the 10th and Patton neighborhood, of Tippit's murderer, etc, etc, etc?

Was it that Oswald was numero uno on their frame-up list, and therefore they had all their ducks in a row "for him" beforehand, and just got lucky that he not only went to work that day, but that the "Oswald-exonerating" PRAYER PERSON image in that pesky Darnell dude's film (and in Wiegman's, too) was so hard to make out until a just a few years ago when Sean Murphy and Bart "The Fart" Kamp came along and explained it all to us?

-- MWT 

PS  If they'd had to frame that Commie, Joe Molina, or somebody else, instead, would they still have alleged that the murder weapon was that particular Carcano?

Hmm?

[John Iacoletti]

And you automatically assume that it must be bogus, right?

Are you automatically assuming that it came from the Carcano?