The number one CT nightmare question ...

[John Mytton]

"A Hidell" could have been anybody.

When Oswald rented PO Box 2915, "A Hidell" was getting stuff sent to Oswald's PO Box? 





And whoever "A Hidell" was, he/she was determined to have a writing style that indicated that they were Oswald?



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

When Oswald rented PO Box 2915, "A Hidell" was getting stuff sent to Oswald's PO Box? 

There's no evidence that such "stuff" was sent to Oswald's PO box.

And whoever "A Hidell" was, he/she was determined to have a writing style that indicated that they were Oswald?

"writing style that indicated that they were Oswald".  LOL.

[John Mytton]

There's no evidence that such "stuff" was sent to Oswald's PO box.

No evidence, LOL!

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

No evidence, LOL!

None whatsoever.

[John Mytton]

None whatsoever.

None whatsoever. LOLOL!

JohnM

[Jorn Frending]

I will now add my fourth question (yes, it gets worse) and reach a conclusion ...

Let's for a moment imagine that Oswald was just manipulated and did not know that something special was going to happen. Well, why didn't he say so. "You know, this woman had a problem, we talked about it and agreed to meet later in the TT."

I therefore believe that Oswald either did it OR had to form part of an organisation which he believed in and was loyal to. If he was betrayed and did not know about the assassination he would have had to be silenced very quickly. The way it was done by Ruby was too risky and could only have been a plan B.

This thread has shown that CT's have no other options as mentioned above, OR accept that "Oswald did it but not alone" and still manage to prove conspiracy.

CT's will have to convince OTHER CT's and review their research.

Otherwise, they will keep walking in circles ...

[John Iacoletti]

None whatsoever. LOLOL!

Feel free to provide some.

LOLOL.

[John Iacoletti]

I will now add my fourth question (yes, it gets worse) and reach a conclusion ...

Let's for a moment imagine that Oswald was just manipulated and did not know that something special was going to happen. Well, why didn't he say so. "You know, this woman had a problem, we talked about it and agreed to meet later in the TT."

I therefore believe that Oswald either did it OR had to form part of an organisation which he believed in and was loyal to. If he was betrayed and did not know about the assassination he would have had to be silenced very quickly. The way it was done by Ruby was too risky and could only have been a plan B.

This thread has shown that CT's have no other options as mentioned above, OR accept that "Oswald did it but not alone" and still manage to prove conspiracy.

CT's will have to convince OTHER CT's and review their research.

Otherwise, they will keep walking in circles ...

Not nearly the circles that the "Oswald did it" theorists have to walk in.

The "what I think conspirators would have done" argument is a failure right out of the box.