CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

I remain 100% sure that Oswald probably did it.

100% sure probably  = you don't know if he did it

Bill thanks for being honest. I always knew he did not do it

[Bill Chapman]

100% sure probably  = you don't know if he did it

Bill thanks for being honest. I always knew he did not do it

Good for you.

It's cool as long as you don't try to claim that I'm in agreement with your conclusions, Peter.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Good for you.

It's cool as long as you don't try to claim that I'm in agreement with your conclusions, Peter.

I don't know what cool means, but I can tell you I could never conflate something like "100% sure probably" you did it on your own.  It is like making a bet, it is still just a bet. You could be right but since you could be wrong that is doubt. I could be wrong but oh well I didn't claim he did it and I don't have to prove he did not do it, because he is innocent until proven guilty that is why you can only say "100% sure probably." You could have said that in terms of probability from 0 to 1 you give it a 1, but no, you decided to use probably which suggest less than 1.

[Ray Mitcham]

I heard Dirty Harvey physically abused his wife. Characterizing the wedding ring as a 'knuckleduster' is symbolic of said spousal abuse.

My inference is clear.

Maybe you heard wrong, Bill, and only believe what you want to believe. Hardly a sound case for an inference.

[Bill Chapman]

I don't know what cool means, but I can tell you I could never conflate something like "100% sure probably" you did it on your own.  It is like making a bet, it is still just a bet. You could be right but since you could be wrong that is doubt. I could be wrong but oh well I didn't claim he did it and I don't have to prove he did not do it, because he is innocent until proven guilty that is why you can only say "100% sure probably." You could have said that in terms of probability from 0 to 1 you give it a 1, but no, you decided to use probably which suggest less than 1.

I think he probably did it. That's 100%.
(I didn't say 'probably 100% sure')
It's tongue-in-cheek... it confuses those who are easily confused.

Anyone can see that I'm an LNer. If someone needs proof from me, then they are out of luck, because I can't prove Oswald guilty.
No one here can.

[Bill Chapman]

Maybe you heard wrong, Bill, and only believe what you want to believe. Hardly a sound case for an inference.

Ruth Paine mentioned Oswald's physical abuse of Marina, in regards having Oswald move out.

[As an aside, my using the ring as a symbolic 'knuckleduster' could fit any abusive relationship, mental or physical. It could even work both ways here if stories about Marina laughing at him for his apparently lofty ambitions is true. That could be seen as being Marina abusing him as well.]

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

I think he probably did it. That's 100%.
(I didn't say 'probably 100% sure')
It's tongue-in-cheek... it confuses those who are easily confused.

Anyone can see that I'm an LNer. If someone needs proof from me, then they are out of luck, because I can't prove Oswald guilty.
No one here can.

That is right, you can't prove he did it

[Bill Chapman]

That is right, you can't prove he did it

Name your shooter, smart guy.
The point is I think Oswald probably did it.