CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Ray Mitcham]

'regardless of what Norman thought he had heard'---Martin
>>> That statement sticks in my craw. You arrogantly, like your tag-team attack-dog doppelgänger Iacoletti, continue to tell witnesses what they thought they saw, and what they really meant.

Both Norman and Euins are African-American
Both are ridiculed by you and Iacoletti.

As somebody with no dog in this fight, your comment about racism is totally stupid.

[Bill Chapman]

As somebody with no dog in this fight, your comment about racism is totally stupid.

Thanks for playing along..

[Bill Chapman]

I'm fairly confident that most of the people on this board, most of the time, do not have a clue what it is you are rambling about.

The ones doing the 'rambling' hereabouts are you lot, what with decades of rinse & repeat... right up the contrarian keister

[Ray Mitcham]

Thanks for playing along..

You're welcome.

[Bill Chapman]

Cite Martin or I ever "demeaning Euins".

P.S. Bonnie Ray Williams in his first day affidavit reported only hearing two shots.

Euins>>>  pissing your diapers over his description of 'bald spot'

BRW: So what, people initially mashed 'firecracker'/'backfire' noises together with what turned out to be rifle shots

[Martin Weidmann]

'regardless of what Norman thought he had heard'---Martin
>>> That statement sticks in my craw. You arrogantly, like your tag-team attack-dog doppelgänger Iacoletti, continue to tell witnesses what they thought they saw, and what they really meant.

Both Norman and Euins are African-American
Both are ridiculed by you and Iacoletti.

Nobody is ridiculing anybody, fool!

Did Norman see the rifle being operated? NO!
He was on another floor and heard clicking sounds, so he can only have THOUGHT that it was a rifle.

I really don't want to know what goes on in that big echo chamber you call a head, but you seriously need to go and look for help because you are losing it completely.

[Ray Mitcham]

Nobody is ridiculing anybody, fool!

Did Norman see the rifle being operated? NO!
He was on another floor and heard clicking sounds, so he can only have THOUGHT that it was a rifle.

I really don't want to know what goes on in that big echo chamber you call a head, but you seriously need to go and look for help because you are losing it completely.

Nobody is ridiculing anybody, fool!

Did Norman see the rifle being operated? NO!
He was on another floor and heard clicking sounds, so he can only have THOUGHT that it was a rifle.

I really don't want to know what goes on in that big echo chamber you call a head, but you seriously need to go and look for help because you are losing it completely.

To mention the race card in these arguments is the equivalent of a black "Godwins Law".
Maybe we should introduce a new Godwins Law  and call it Chapman's law.

[Richard Smith]

Nobody is ridiculing anybody, fool!

Did Norman see the rifle being operated? NO!
He was on another floor and heard clicking sounds, so he can only have THOUGHT that it was a rifle.

I really don't want to know what goes on in that big echo chamber you call a head, but you seriously need to go and look for help because you are losing it completely.

A great example of how a dishonest contrarian tries to set forth an impossible standard of proof.  Here we have a witness that describes hearing shots directly over his head including the operation of the rifle and the shell casings hitting the floor, and we are told to discount this because he didn't "see the rifle being operated."  LOL.  You can't make up that kind of idiocy.  To compound this stupidity of course is the fact that other witnesses did see a rifle in that window at that moment, three shell casings were found by that window, and a rifle was found on that floor.  What does this contrarian believe was going on to explain all this if no one was firing from that location?  Who knows?  Maybe Roger Collins could enlighten us as Martin seems clueless.