CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Bill Chapman]

Ask the guy who made the drawing.

Why? You're the one using the drawing. And JerryO is the guy who did the drawing if I remember correctly... and am I wrong in recalling you explaining DevAd connection with the horns?

[Bill Chapman]

I'm not claiming anything.  What makes you think it's a Carcano in the backyard photos?

Define "fake".

 

[Bill Chapman]

If this is not a belief, then what do you call it?

Here, let me demonstrate the word 'believe' in a sentence:

"I believe you've weaponized the word both here and on TAE"

 

[Bill Chapman]

What it your source for this quote?

There is no "whole of the evidence".  Just a few weak and circumstantial things that are all questionable, impeachable, arguable, or tainted in some way, and a boatload of speculation and conjecture.

What it your source for this quote?
>>> Huh? You post here as if this was a court of law, yet don't know that basic tenet?
Look it up, 'researcher'.
 
Oswald was the one 'tainted in some way'
He might as well have worn a tshirt saying 'Just Did It'

Everything is arguable to a guy openly demonstrating his contrarianism by using devil's horns on his portrait.

It's the CT Ship of Fools that has the 'boatload full of speculation and conjecture'.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

What it your source for this quote?
>>> Huh? You post here as if this was a court of law, yet don't know that basic tenet?
Look it up, 'researcher'.
 
Oswald was the one 'tainted in some way'
He might as well have worn tshirt a saying 'Just Did It'

Everything is arguable to a guy openly demonstrating his contrarianism by using devil's horns on his portrait.

It's the CT Ship of Fools that has the 'boatload full of speculation and conjecture'.

You know if the SS would have done their job protecting the President from assassination there would not have been an assassination, so they failed and that means they did not do their job. It also was not their job to take the murdered body of the President out of the State of Texas. Those are facts that justify the speculative theory you are 100% sure probably might have happened or you think perhaps maybe sometimes but maybe never happened

[John Iacoletti]

Why? You're the one using the drawing. And JerryO is the guy who did the drawing if I remember correctly... and am I wrong in recalling you explaining DevAd connection with the horns?

Yes, you are wrong.  Your recollections usually are.

[John Iacoletti]

Here, let me demonstrate the word 'believe' in a sentence:

"I believe you've weaponized the word both here and on TAE"

 

What "weapon"?  You either have reasons for the things you believe or you don't.  If you have any reasons for your "100% sure that Oswald probably did it" belief, you've never actually articulated any of them on this forum.

[John Iacoletti]

What it your source for this quote?
>>> Huh? You post here as if this was a court of law, yet don't know that basic tenet?
Look it up, 'researcher'.

Why so evasive as to the source of your quote?
 

Oswald was the one 'tainted in some way'
He might as well have worn a tshirt saying 'Just Did It'

I suppose you consider this "evidence" too...

Everything is arguable to a guy openly demonstrating his contrarianism by using devil's horns on his portrait.

You sure like to assume things, don't you?  Because of course you do.

What passes for "evidence" in this case is questionable, impeachable, arguable, or tainted in some way because it just is.  The specifics have been discussed at length by people who unlike you actually understand the evidence beyond faulty "recollections" of something they heard somewhere.

It's the CT Ship of Fools that has the 'boatload full of speculation and conjecture'.

Feel free to name a specific example of me basing a truth claim on speculation and conjecture.