CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Bill Chapman]

Nope, Frazier didn't say that he saw LHO bring in a rifle,  he did not say LHO assembled a rifle and also did not say anything about a sniper's nest.  What else you got, anything from the Dirty Brown Shirt handbook of lies?

Wow

[Michael Walton]

The whole premise of the Lone Nut only case is this...

That 3 shots were fired. The first shot went through his upper back throat and didn't exit came out of this throat and went on to hit Connally.

The second shot just missed wildly, kicking up concrete way down by the underpass and nicking a bystander.

The third hit him in the head throwing his head forcefully toward the rear defying the laws of physics.

That, in and of itself, is a great starting point to argue against the official theoretical conclusions in a court of law by a team of lawyers for the dead defendant.

[Bill Chapman]

He didn’t say “reversed”. Fake quoter!

Well?

[Dan O'meara]

How would I defend Oswald in court?

I'd point out all the lies and deceit in the testimonies of various TSBD employees and make the easy case that there was grounds for collusion beyond the "Oswald the Loner" angle.
It is beyond doubt that some of the employees are lying in their testimonies.
If it was a simple case that Oswald acted alone there would be no need for all these falsehoods.
Everything would be really straight-forward. Innocent folk describing where they were and what they were doing at the time of the assassination.
But that's not what we see.
What we see in the testimonies of quite a few of the TSBD employees is a labyrinthine complex of lies and deceit.

Reasonable Doubt that Oswald acted alone would be one of the easiest arguments to make ever.

[John Iacoletti]

Well?

Well what?  Have you forgotten over the last year and a half it took you to respond to this that you accusing somebody of "fake quoting" you for changing the tense of a word just like that?

[Bill Chapman]

Well what?  Have you forgotten over the last year and a half it took you to respond to this that you accusing somebody of "fake quoting" you for changing the tense of a word just like that?

You're assuming that I saw that post before today.
'Fake quoter' is your term

Now tell us the difference between reversed and reversal.

[Joe Elliott]

I’m not a CTer, but I would defend Oswald by having him testify that he found and rifle on the sixth floor and picked it up. He wished he didn’t do that. Then, 45 minutes later, while out for a walk, he saw a police officer had been shot, found a gun laying on the ground and picked it up. He wished he didn’t do that. He intended to turn the gun over to the police so he put it in his pocket but then forgot about it.

[Walt Cakebread]

I recently have been getting reacquainted with the OJ case and it left me wondering how would JFK CT's handle the Oswald conspiracy in court?

To win the OJ case the "Dream Team" capitalized on the alleged racist atmosphere of LA, so the "Dream Team" invented a reasonably plausible alternative narrative, whereas the JFK CT's have given us virtually nothing?

Who planted what and why? What did they have to gain?

The prosecution would be presenting evidence piled on evidence and eyewitness after eyewitness, and in return what would the JFK CT's present and where do your theories go?

JohnM

Johnny Cockran  told the jury that the cops had planted evidence to incriminate OJ.....( I believe that to be true)  But the Cops knew they were up against  a millionaire and popular celebrity BLACK man and feared that he would escape justice because a large portion of the Black community might start rioting if OJ was convicted. The cops wanted an air tight case against OJ so to ensure that that was presented to the jury....They planted evidence  ( it worked in the murder of JFK)