Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 118123 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #64 on: June 26, 2019, 10:12:55 AM »
Advertisement
And his experience leads him to make the rhetorical argument that leaving one's wedding ring behind is evidence of murder.

 :D

The wedding ring evidence is less than 2% of Bugliosi's case.


JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #64 on: June 26, 2019, 10:12:55 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #65 on: June 26, 2019, 11:37:03 AM »
The wedding ring evidence is less than 2% of Bugliosi's case.

JohnM

Ok, let's say the wedding ring is evidence…… but evidence of what?

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #66 on: June 26, 2019, 11:59:09 AM »
Ok, let's say the wedding ring is evidence…… but evidence of what?

Evidence, obviously, that Oswald was a very happy-with-life man!

D'oh

-- MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: June 26, 2019, 11:59:43 AM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #66 on: June 26, 2019, 11:59:09 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #67 on: June 26, 2019, 12:12:23 PM »
Evidence, obviously, that Oswald was a very happy-with-life man!

D'oh

-- MWT  ;)

I'll take that reply as "I haven't got a clue", shall I?

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #68 on: June 26, 2019, 12:26:03 PM »
I'll take that reply as "I haven't got a clue", shall I?

No, no, no, no, no!

You don't understand!

Only people who are happy murder other people!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #68 on: June 26, 2019, 12:26:03 PM »


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5291
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #69 on: June 26, 2019, 02:43:13 PM »
Ok, let's say the wedding ring is evidence…… but evidence of what?

It demonstrates foreknowledge that he might be killed or arrested that day.  Can you guess why?  Consult Roger Collins on the implications of that.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #70 on: June 26, 2019, 05:07:38 PM »
The wedding ring evidence is less than 2% of Bugliosi's case.

If he was honest, it would be 0%

Just like the rest of his contrived "evidence".

- Leaving his wedding ring behind at the Paine house is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Not reading the newspaper in the domino room that morning is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Going to the second floor to get a Coke when he preferred Dr. Pepper is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Not being chatty with the cab driver is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Showing reporters his handcuffed hands is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Marina thinking his eyes looked guilty is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Leaving his blue jacket in the domino room is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Leaving a clipboard on the sixth floor is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.

 :D

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #71 on: June 26, 2019, 05:09:32 PM »
It demonstrates foreknowledge that he might be killed or arrested that day.

Only via confirmation bias.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #71 on: June 26, 2019, 05:09:32 PM »