Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 132833 times)

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #64 on: June 26, 2019, 12:12:23 PM »
Advertisement
Evidence, obviously, that Oswald was a very happy-with-life man!

D'oh

-- MWT  ;)

I'll take that reply as "I haven't got a clue", shall I?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #64 on: June 26, 2019, 12:12:23 PM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #65 on: June 26, 2019, 12:26:03 PM »
I'll take that reply as "I haven't got a clue", shall I?

No, no, no, no, no!

You don't understand!

Only people who are happy murder other people!

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5450
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #66 on: June 26, 2019, 02:43:13 PM »
Ok, let's say the wedding ring is evidence…… but evidence of what?

It demonstrates foreknowledge that he might be killed or arrested that day.  Can you guess why?  Consult Roger Collins on the implications of that.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #66 on: June 26, 2019, 02:43:13 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10997
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #67 on: June 26, 2019, 05:07:38 PM »
The wedding ring evidence is less than 2% of Bugliosi's case.

If he was honest, it would be 0%

Just like the rest of his contrived "evidence".

- Leaving his wedding ring behind at the Paine house is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Not reading the newspaper in the domino room that morning is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Going to the second floor to get a Coke when he preferred Dr. Pepper is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Not being chatty with the cab driver is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Showing reporters his handcuffed hands is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Marina thinking his eyes looked guilty is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Leaving his blue jacket in the domino room is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Leaving a clipboard on the sixth floor is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.

 :D

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10997
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #68 on: June 26, 2019, 05:09:32 PM »
It demonstrates foreknowledge that he might be killed or arrested that day.

Only via confirmation bias.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #68 on: June 26, 2019, 05:09:32 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #69 on: June 26, 2019, 05:25:33 PM »
If he was honest, it would be 0%

Just like the rest of his contrived "evidence".

- Leaving his wedding ring behind at the Paine house is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Not reading the newspaper in the domino room that morning is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Going to the second floor to get a Coke when he preferred Dr. Pepper is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Not being chatty with the cab driver is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Showing reporters his handcuffed hands is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Marina thinking his eyes looked guilty is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Leaving his blue jacket in the domino room is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.
- Leaving a clipboard on the sixth floor is evidence that points toward Oswald's guilt.

 :D

Bug said he exaggerated on purpose

Try to figure that out again; the first time around you got it wrong

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #70 on: June 26, 2019, 05:36:27 PM »
It demonstrates foreknowledge that he might be killed or arrested that day.  Can you guess why?  Consult Roger Collins on the implications of that.

It demonstrates foreknowledge that he might be killed or arrested that day.

No it doesn't

Btw have you figured out already why the trial against Clay Shaw, as a conspirator in Kennedy's murder, was held in New Orleans, when, as you rather pathetically claimed, the trial could only be held in Texas as the JFK murder fell under that state's jurisdiction?



Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10997
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #71 on: June 26, 2019, 05:43:36 PM »
Bug said he exaggerated on purpose

Try to figure that out again; the first time around you got it wrong

Tell that to the members of his fan club who call his "exaggerations" evidence.

By the way, when did he say this?  It this another one of your "if memory serves" claims?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #71 on: June 26, 2019, 05:43:36 PM »