Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 120022 times)

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #232 on: July 10, 2019, 02:03:29 AM »
Advertisement
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.pressdemocrat.com/news/2884078-181/oswalds-wife-finds-a-cryptic%3fview=AMP

'By that time in the spring of 1963, Paine said, she'd come to resent that Oswald was physically abusive of Marina and he wanted to control and keep her isolated.'

But the testimony stands. Ruth resented Oswald's controlling Marina......indeed......who was controlling whom?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #232 on: July 10, 2019, 02:03:29 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #233 on: July 10, 2019, 02:21:59 AM »
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon

Huh?

Your example is chalk and cheese, this isn't an "idea", these people were not imagining anything, they can only give evidence of what they heard.



JohnM

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #234 on: July 10, 2019, 02:45:49 AM »
Huh?

Your example is chalk and cheese, this isn't an "idea", these people were not imagining anything, they can only give evidence of what they heard.



JohnM

Are you pleading ignorance or do you truly not understand John's valid point?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #234 on: July 10, 2019, 02:45:49 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #235 on: July 10, 2019, 03:03:24 AM »
Are you pleading ignorance or do you truly not understand John's valid point?

Did you read the page that was linked to, they were discussing "ideas" that haven't been experienced, like "Flat Earth" or "Leprechauns" whereas these people actually heard the evidence that we are discussing, what's the connection?

As usual I provide the evidence and you call them liars, when will it ever end?



JohnM

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #236 on: July 10, 2019, 03:11:04 AM »
Did you read the page that was linked to, they were discussing "ideas" that haven't been experienced, like "Flat Earth" or "Leprechauns" whereas these people actually heard the evidence that we are discussing, what's the connection?

As usual I provide the evidence and you call them liars, when will it ever end?



JohnM

So it is indeed ignorance…. got it!

I didn't call anybody a liar, but the fallacy is that even if the majority of people say something happened one way, it still does not mean it really happened that way. Ergo; any appeal to a majority opinion doesn't constitute proof of anything.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #236 on: July 10, 2019, 03:11:04 AM »


Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #237 on: July 10, 2019, 05:11:56 AM »
No, the vast majority of the ear-witnesses said they heard 3 shots.

JohnM
A vast majority of people say a lot of things. You are not saying you are influenced by popularity contests? You also have seen the film of many more people running up the grassy knoll or am I confusing that with a film of NO people running up the street to a building that deals with school books or something???

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #238 on: July 10, 2019, 06:44:08 AM »
Perhaps sometimes always but maybe never.
BTW  post-it notes didn't exist until 1979 but unreliable versions were tested the ten years leading up to 3m selling the official post-it in US markets.  I am confident there are no pictures of Oswald with post-it notes all over him. Maybe you probably think there is

I said 'like' post-it notes, professor.
Don't try to be witty, you're just not good at it.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #239 on: July 10, 2019, 06:52:22 AM »
Being personally sure about something is not a particularly compelling argument.

Are you under the impression that I'm arguing about my personal conclusions? 
« Last Edit: July 10, 2019, 06:53:58 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #239 on: July 10, 2019, 06:52:22 AM »