Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 119843 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #616 on: August 29, 2019, 01:17:39 PM »
Advertisement
Tell us what stance I've 'reversed'

He didn’t say “reversed”. Fake quoter!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #616 on: August 29, 2019, 01:17:39 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #617 on: August 29, 2019, 07:13:45 PM »
He didn’t say “reversed”. Fake quoter!

Supply what stance I changed to arrive at 'probably', SemanticSuckJohnny.
'Peter' has failed to do so...

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #618 on: August 30, 2019, 02:17:30 AM »
Supply what stance I changed to arrive at 'probably', SemanticSuckJohnny.

What does that have to do with you fake quoting Peter?

Sauce for the goose, quote-boy..

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #618 on: August 30, 2019, 02:17:30 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #619 on: August 30, 2019, 09:24:12 PM »
You're talking about formal debate
This forum is the Wild West by comparison

Point out what I 'made up' other than clever mockery.

You didn't answer my question. It's apparent to me, that you feel a person can post any untrue ridiculous comment without having to provide any evidence for that claim. Correct? If that's the case, the poster shouldn't be taken seriously who only makes up fraudulent statements. Basically, you don't care what is being said, as long as it fits with your false narrative and you can use it to make a false point. Correct?   

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #620 on: August 30, 2019, 09:26:12 PM »
Point out where I ever claimed the WC a courtroom.

So, you feel a person can state false claims anywhere but not just in a courtroom?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #620 on: August 30, 2019, 09:26:12 PM »


Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #621 on: August 31, 2019, 09:41:49 AM »
Tell us what stance I've 'reversed'
I don't have to show anything by your standard, remember it's not a courtroom? See it is an ongoing thing with you-you can't make up your mind but you can make it up as you go along. Very defensive and unsure of yourself. Flip flop waffle master

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #622 on: September 01, 2019, 12:36:14 AM »
Dear Peter,

You mean Buell Wesley Frazier didn't say (under penalty of perjury) that he saw, with his very own 20/20 eyeballs, Lee Harvey Oswald not only carry that long package into the building that morning, but assemble the rifle up there in the sniper's nest, as well?

Gosh darn it, I guess Oswald was innocent, after all, huh.

-- MWT ;)

Probably not

 ;)

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #623 on: September 01, 2019, 05:04:16 AM »
Probably not

 ;)
Nope, Frazier didn't say that he saw LHO bring in a rifle,  he did not say LHO assembled a rifle and also did not say anything about a sniper's nest.  What else you got, anything from the Dirty Brown Shirt handbook of lies?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #623 on: September 01, 2019, 05:04:16 AM »