Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: NEW! Drop-dead visual proof that the rifle and scope in the “Backyard photos”...  (Read 12045 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Advertisement
A lot of modern-day camera's have 'object focus' capabilities which can cause this effect. It can look 'too' clean cut but still not be a modified photo.

Thanks!

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Thumb1:

Q. Are there any differences in the grain pattern in the areas of the body. head, and background on the negative of Oswald?
A. No inconsistencies could be detected between the areas mentioned with examination of the original negative through a 30X magnifier, on normal contrast enlarged prints, or on high contrast enlarged transparencies (figs. RIT 9--1 A and B).

https://people.rit.edu/andpph/text-oswald-HSCA-report.html



JohnM

Thanks John for the solid photographic evidence.

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Thumb1:

Q. Are there any differences in the grain pattern in the areas of the body. head, and background on the negative of Oswald?
A. No inconsistencies could be detected between the areas mentioned with examination of the original negative through a 30X magnifier, on normal contrast enlarged prints, or on high contrast enlarged transparencies (figs. RIT 9--1 A and B).

https://people.rit.edu/andpph/text-oswald-HSCA-report.html



JohnM

You are having a conversation with yourself. Show me some proof.  Boring

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Thanks John for the solid photographic evidence.

Hi Steve yeah, when you have the original negative it's all over red rover!
There's telltale signs of grain differentiation when any two images are combined, the first problem is at this microscopic granular level you can't just cut out Oswald's head and stick it on someone else because unless Oswald's face/chin/whatever was taken at the exact same distance then the grain size that makes up the photos will be different and without the the same angle of sun on the Oswald face composite, then we have another problem.
Also at this microscopic level you can see the bleeding between edges which with traditional cut and pasting would require a fair amount of post processing which would further degrade the film grain and make it nothing like similar original film stock.



It's undeniable, it's Oswald and he's holding the weapon that murdered the President.



JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Here are some screen shots from Executive Action 1973 and before computers this is pretty much how photo compositing was done and straight away you can see that lighting, grain size, focus and edges are all going to be impossible to massage into the perfect microscopic grain distribution of the original negative.









JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
And in case anyone is wondering about Oswald's squared off chin in the backyard photo, it's the result of an overhead light source.





JohnM

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
And in case anyone is wondering about Oswald's squared off chin in the backyard photo, it's the result of an overhead light source.





JohnM
No, I think it's global warming.

"Overhead light source" That is a crazy explanation and has been used to cover every anomaly. Try again

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
No, I think it's global warming.

"Overhead light source" That is a crazy explanation and has been used to cover every anomaly. Try again

Tell us what's 'crazy' about it, Rembrandt.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2019, 08:34:03 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum