As I said, it is not a good idea to base a conclusion based on a single photo: i.e. concluding that she looked concerned because of her expression in Croft's photo.
My point was that just because they may have initially attributed the first bang to a firecracker, ensuing events would have persuaded them that it wasn't. It is difficult to believe, without evidence, that anyone who initially thought it was a firecracker would have continued to believe - after the three shots - that the first loud bang was a firecracker (or, as Jerry insists, would have forgotten about the first loud noise completely).
He turned his head to the right at the same time that Jackie and JFK turned their head to the right. He never turns around to look at the President, which is what he said he did in response to the first shot, until after z230.
And my point is that if you want to draw conclusions from evidence it must fit with all the evidence. If what you think you see in the zfilm does not fit with the rest of the evidence you should try another interpretation that does.
As I said, it is not a good idea to base a conclusion based on a single photo: i.e. concluding that she looked concerned because of her expression in Croft's photo.As I said, there is other corroborating evidence that supports this. And as I said earlier, I described this evidence earlier in this thread.
My point was that just because they may have initially attributed the first bang to a firecracker, ensuing events would have persuaded them that it wasn't. It is difficult to believe, without evidence, that anyone who initially thought it was a firecracker would have continued to believe - after the three shots - that the first loud bang was a firecracker (or, as Jerry insists, would have forgotten about the first loud noise completely).The Croft photo was taken before the second shot occurred. Therefore the ensuing events you are apparently trying to inject do not apply to Jackie's expression in that photo.
He turned his head to the right at the same time that Jackie and JFK turned their head to the right. He never turns around to look at the President, which is what he said he did in response to the first shot, until after z230.
At Z148 JBC has turned as far right as he apparently can then begins a snap turn to his left. In my opinion he could be trying to turn far enough to look at the President.
At Z161 JBC has turned to his left and begins to turn back to his right. JFK has
already turned back to his right.
At 179 JBC has turned back to his right. In my opinion he is trying to turn far enough to get a look at the President.
Then at Z223 JBC has begun to turn back to his left as he re-appears from behind the sign.
At Z224 JBC shows effects of being hit.
And my point is that if you want to draw conclusions from evidence it must fit with all the evidence. If what you think you see in the zfilm does not fit with the rest of the evidence you should try another interpretation that does. There is much conflicting evidence in this case. Especially the (fallible) eyewitness accounts. No conclusion will ever fit all the evidence. This is typical for such events. If everything fit perfectly,
then I would suspect a conspiracy and cover-up. I have argued with you about your interpretation of your cherry-picked eyewitness accounts years ago under another screen name, "Porterhaus" if I remember correctly. You did help me learn more about how various angles affect how we see the images. Thanks.