The Ed Forum is having a total Meltdown and chicken bones!

[David Von Pein]

So do you continue to believe Mooney was mistaken given the weight of evidence of the initial existence of the chicken lunch in the SN?

Yes, of course Mooney was mistaken. The proof of that fact is in Bonnie Ray's testimony.

[Colin Crow]

Yes, of course Mooney was mistaken. The proof of that fact is in Bonnie Ray's testimony.

And Harry Weatherford was mistaken too....

Harry Weatherford

The 11-23-63 report of Deputy Sheriff Harry Weatherford notes "I came down to the 6th floor, and while searching this floor, Deputy Luke Mooney said "here are some shells." I went over to where he was and saw 3 expended rifle shells, a sack on the floor and a partially eaten piece of chicken on top of one of the cartons which was used as a sort of barricade."

There are another 5 or so who saw remnants of the lunch in the SN before Fritz arrived. Are they all mistaken too?

Perhaps you can point out how Bonnie Ray's testimony proves they were all mistaken.

[Peter Goth]

In that scenario you'd be working for me.

  right. good one.

[Peter Goth]

That's nonsense.

You cannot say whatever you want on a media platform you do not own, and then expect to be allowed to contnue using that platform. The owner not allowing you to continue, is not a violation of free speech.

There is restraint and compliance. I'm sorry you didn't learn that responsibility in your radio days.

[Peter Goth]

@ moderator of this forum:

What would happen to the posting rights
 if a member, went on to their own fb page, and said,

"you [mod] are definitely an incompetent as far as the JFK case and evidence are concerned, esp, SBT."

[Duncan MacRae]

@ moderator of this forum:

What would happen to the posting rights
 if a member, went on to their own fb page, and said,

"you [mod] are definitely an incompetent as far as the JFK case and evidence are concerned, esp, SBT."

Nothing would happen, an obvious misidentification would have been made.

I would say to the member "You are confusing me with James Gordon, the incompetent Clog licking Admin of the Ed Forum"   

[Peter Goth]

Nothing would happen, an obvious misidentification mistake would have been made.

I would say to the member "You are confusing me with James Gordon, the incompetent Clog licking Admin of the Ed Forum"   

HA HA.
I'll clarify, something that actually insults YOU.

[Michael Walton]

@ moderator of this forum:

What would happen to the posting rights
 if a member, went on to their own fb page, and said,

"you [mod] are definitely an incompetent as far as the JFK case and evidence are concerned, esp, SBT."

Peter...Peter, Peter Pumpkin Eater (I know...had to say this because Halloween is my favorite holiday) --

Can you kinda, sorta stick to a somewhat reasonable discussion of the Kennedy case please? This is not the "shooting the spombleprofglidnoctobuns at the dingy bar" forum. It's a "JFK was murdered" forum.

You're kinda, sorta all over the place here, burying other posts related to why we're here. And you may want to start by sharing your own JFK narrative here, Like Dave VP took the time to do.

So take that final drag of your Kool Menthol, down your last shot and start pecking away. Here, I'll help you...

Here's what I think happened in the JFK case...

-----



-----

Thanks.