The "Domino Room Alibi"

[Colin Crow]

      You believe THEY are lying. Why did They lie?

They did lie.....look at the various statements. As for their motivation to lie....that the real discussion. Evidence needs to be substantiated. The claim by Williams of a meeting of workmates on the 6th floor is unsubstantiated, unsupported by events and not investigated by the WC. In any court of law would be treated as such. He was a liar. The question is why. Why did others lie in an attempt to remove him from the 6th floor? There is no question that they lied.....it in the statements for anyone to see. Givens also lied about seeing Oswald during his "cigarette trip". I have no doubt Oswald lied in custody......the funny thing is we have no record of it, simply the statements of others. Yet we have signed statements from Williams, Jarman, Norman and Givens that all contain lies. 

I have serious issues with those LN proponents who dismiss the evidence that seems inconvenient to them. Why investigate the case at all? How far have they come from the conclusions of day one? The WR author(s) were unwilling or unable to digest and analyse (or both) their own assembled evidence.

[Royell Storing]

They did lie.....look at the various statements. As for their motivation to lie....that the real discussion. Evidence needs to be substantiated. The claim by Williams of a meeting of workmates on the 6th floor is unsubstantiated, unsupported by events and not investigated by the WC. In any court of law would be treated as such. He was a liar. The question is why. Why did others lie in an attempt to remove him from the 6th floor? There is no question that they lied.....it in the statements for anyone to see. Givens also lied about seeing Oswald during his "cigarette trip". I have no doubt Oswald lied in custody......the funny thing is we have no record of it, simply the statements of others. Yet we have signed statements from Williams, Jarman, Norman and Givens that all contain lies.

    You're too good to Not have your own theory. Show some stones.

[John Iacoletti]

    You're too good to Not have your own theory. Show some stones.

You want him to make up a story? That’s what the charlatans do.

[Colin Crow]

    You're too good to Not have your own theory. Show some stones.

I have previously on numerous occasions. JohnM and I are not to far apart. My understanding is we both believe that Williams left the SN a few minutes before the shots after an interaction with the assassin. He thinks it was Oswald, I am not convinced it was.

[Royell Storing]

You want him to make up a story? That’s what the charlatans do.

    There's nothing wrong with having a "Working Theory". The entire case is based on one = SBT

[Colin Crow]

    You're too good to Not have your own theory. Show some stones.

To help relieve your ignorance......from 3 years ago......easier to listen than read sometimes

https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/(References & links to websites which contain pornographic images and/or abusive content directed at members of this Forum is strictly prohibited )cevents/episodes/2016-09-21T00_28_29-07_00

[Royell Storing]

To help relieve your ignorance......from 3 years ago......easier to listen than read sometimes

https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/(References & links to websites which contain pornographic images and/or abusive content directed at members of this Forum is strictly prohibited )cevents/episodes/2016-09-21T00_28_29-07_00

    Thanks for providing that Link. You write in Part 3, "For some reason Williams, Norman, and Jarman were not totally candid about what happened that day". So finish the story. Why were they, "....not totally candid about what happened that day"?

[Colin Crow]

How did Lance Payette’s argument about the domino room alibi morph into where the shot that killed JFK originated from?

Looks like a fart in a spacesuit post to me.....does Lance really practice law David?