Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 156182 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #984 on: December 11, 2019, 02:04:24 PM »
Advertisement
Thank you, Mark. This is the same answer I was about to provide (pretty much!) ;)

 :D

So your explanation for the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady's side in Wiegman------------



---------------is?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #984 on: December 11, 2019, 02:04:24 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2774
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #985 on: December 11, 2019, 03:08:52 PM »
No photographs/films were altered.  Period.  Obviously, Mssr. Ford knows nothing of photogrammetry, as Jack White even testified that he himself did not know what the word meant.  Oswald shot Kennedy.  He also shot Tippit.  He almost shot Walker.  He almost shot himself (and he doesn't even know how to slit a wrist !!!  LOL !!!)  What a total loser and Kennedy Killer he wuz' !!

    ANY "Cropped" Image has been ALTERED. ANY B/W Image which is "Colorized" has been ALTERED. This occurs in general and Specifically on this Forum All-The-Time.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #986 on: December 11, 2019, 05:11:36 PM »
Now!

1. It is noticed very quickly that a man resembling the accused assassin can be seen in the doorway in the Altgens photography.

2. Even before that, it is known to those privy to Mr Oswald's interrogation that Mr Oswald is placing himself out there at the time of the Presidential parade.

3. The Wiegman film is consulted, and to the horror of the cover-up investigators, Mr Oswald is recognisably there-----------but just behind Mr Billy Lovelady, the man in Altgens. The film has already been broadcast more than once to millions on NBC. To make matters worse, the presenter made a point of explaining during the running of the frames in question that they show the Depository building. So simply disappearing these frames is not an option! There is only one solution: monkey with the film before releasing 'it' back into the public domain!

4. When those tasked with altering the film look at the frames of Mr Lovelady at lower elevation, they don't see this...



What they see is Mr Lovelady's body in full sunlight and behind him the face of Mr Oswald, as identifiable as Mr Lovelady's just under him.

That face has gotta go!

5. And so they obscure Mr Oswald's face out by mimicking the effects of shadow. Thankfully-----------as Mr Mytton has shown------------that area is still brimming with detail, which enables us to make out the presence if not the features of Mr Oswald even in the doctored frames.  Thumb1:



6. But why do they also put a fake shadow down Mr Lovelady? Surely there's nothing needs covering up there?

Bien au contraire! They must put a fake shadow down Mr Lovelady because the other frames-------------the frames showing Mr Lovelady at upper elevation----------------need a fake shadow! You can't just give him a shadow and then have it gone just after. You'd only be tipping people off to the fix you've put in!

7. But why the need for shadow down Mr Lovelady in those Lovelady@HigherElevation frames?

The answer is that these frames, while they are not quite so disastrous as the lower-elevation frames (they don't show Mr Oswald's face clearly enough for identification), do show enough of his body and right arm to identify him as a manual employee.

8. So! Those tasked with altering Wiegman do not see what we see in the initial frames here when they receive the unaltered film...



No! They receive a film showing these frames with enough of Mr Oswald's white tshirt and right arm showing to rule out the second head's being a photofilmic quirk (e.g. motion blur). The second head must be deprived of its body!

9. And so they mimic the effects of shadow down Mr Lovelady's side--------------starting at the point furthest west on his body they can go, i.e. the point where his body disappears in Altgens!



10. It cannot be stressed enough, friends, that the entire scam is predicated on one giant gamble: that no one will notice that the shadow down Mr Lovelady is an impossible shadow.

I sincerely hope Mr Barry Pollard has been following this thread, for he saw what's what!

 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: December 12, 2019, 10:10:14 AM by Alan Ford »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #986 on: December 11, 2019, 05:11:36 PM »


Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #987 on: December 12, 2019, 09:41:32 AM »
Kleinschmidt,

Please remind us -- What are you convinced of regarding the assassination?

Do you think any of the photographs were altered?

--  MWT  ;)

Which ones? There was one

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #988 on: December 13, 2019, 02:37:58 AM »

--------that helps us confirm what I have been saying all along:

The second head right behind Mr Lovelady's in the Lovelady@UpperElevation frames--------------



Thank you, Mr Mytton! Thumb1:

Quote
The second head right behind Mr Lovelady's in the Lovelady@UpperElevation frames--------------
---------------is no chimera, no photofilmic quirk. It is attached to a real person who is still there in the Lovelady@LowerElevation frames!

And his name is Mr Lee Harvey Oswald, which unacceptable fact explains the initial conundrum of why on earth a dark shadow would have been added down Mr Lovelady!

Wrong! Lovelady is independently in the process of bending down and we are seeing Lovelady's motion blurred image being captured in the opposite direction to the movement of the camera.





Lovelady's "second head" in each instance is proportionally positioned compared to the speed and panning direction of Wiegman's camera.











LOVELADY'S TWO HEAD'S BS:





Quote
Thank you, Mr Mytton!

Thumb1:

JohnM
« Last Edit: December 13, 2019, 02:44:50 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #988 on: December 13, 2019, 02:37:58 AM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #989 on: December 13, 2019, 03:13:23 AM »
Wrong! Lovelady is independently in the process of bending down and we are seeing Lovelady's motion blurred image being captured in the opposite direction to the movement of the camera.





Lovelady's "second head" in each instance is proportionally positioned compared to the speed and panning direction of Wiegman's camera.











LOVELADY'S TWO HEAD'S BS:





Thumb1:

JohnM

John,

Excellent post.

--  MWT  ;)

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 990
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #990 on: December 13, 2019, 03:34:06 AM »
Lovelady died at the relatively young age of 45 and coincidentally just before he was scheduled to be questioned by the HSCA

Sarah Stanton (who is prayerblob imo)   
was not called to testify by WC. She remained unwilling to be interviewed

Buell W. Frazier for 50 years had no recollection of having seen Oswald out front of TSBD....until after the 2003 Beyond Conspiracy (WC report revised and extended)....when EUREKA!.. BWF now does recall seeing Oswald “out front”, albeit not exactly on the steps

The timing of BWF sighting Oswald had to be about not later than approx 2 min 45 sec post shots since BWF returned into TSBD before the front door was locked by DPD officer Barnett at approx 3 min post shots.

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #991 on: December 13, 2019, 05:30:47 AM »
Stop lying, you are becoming too comfortable like it is a skill when it is a bad habit. You need to learn how to be honest and then you will be able to analyze whatever you want. Not in this lifetime, you already ruined any chance of that happening

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #991 on: December 13, 2019, 05:30:47 AM »