Hypothetical

[Colin Crow]

Consider the following scenario.
The rifle is never found in the TSBD.
Oswald leaves the TSBD prior to the roll call and is killed shortly after by hit and run driver in a Nash Rambler on Elm (detail just for fun).
Dillard has no film in his camera.

Who is the prime suspect?

[Thomas Graves]

Consider the following scenario.
The rifle is never found in the TSBD.
Oswald leaves the TSBD prior to the roll call and is killed shortly after by hit and run driver in a Nash Rambler on Elm (detail just for fun).
Dillard has no film in his camera.

Who is the prime suspect?

Gilberto Policarpo Lopez and/or Miguel Casas Saez.

--  MWT 

[Colin Crow]

There was no roll call.

Updated for you.

[Thomas Graves]

Consider the following scenario.
The rifle is never found in the TSBD.
Oswald leaves the TSBD prior to the roll call and is killed shortly after by hit and run driver in a Nash Rambler on Elm (detail just for fun).
Dillard has no film in his camera.

Who is the prime suspect?

Colin,

You seem to be suggesting the rifle was planted.

Under your hypothetical, were any rifles found in the TSBD?

-- MWT 

[Colin Crow]

Colin,

You seem to be suggesting the rifle was planted.

Under your hypothetical, were any rifles found in the TSBD?

-- MWT 

No Tommy,
I am proposing a hypothetical where Oswald did the deed but those events occurred. The rifle was not found because maybe he found a better way of concealing it.

[Richard Smith]

Consider the following scenario.
The rifle is never found in the TSBD.
Oswald leaves the TSBD prior to the roll call and is killed shortly after by hit and run driver in a Nash Rambler on Elm (detail just for fun).
Dillard has no film in his camera.

Who is the prime suspect?

There are witnesses that confirm they saw a person with a rifle in the TSBD.  Oswald has no alibi for the moment of the assassination.  He is person known to the FBI even prior to the assassination.  At a minimum, he becomes a person of interest from the moment the DPD finds out his wacky background, that he worked in the building, and that he left in the immediate aftermath.  The investigation would then confirm from his wife and the BY photos that he owned a rifle and that it could not be accounted for. in the place where he kept it.  If he somehow smuggles it out of the TSBD in a bag, it is soon found.  Same result.  Oswald is the prime suspect (i.e. guilty).

[Walt Cakebread]

Consider the following scenario.
The rifle is never found in the TSBD.
Oswald leaves the TSBD prior to the roll call and is killed shortly after by hit and run driver in a Nash Rambler on Elm (detail just for fun).
Dillard has no film in his camera.

Who is the prime suspect?

Isn't there enough information (evidence) to examine?.....   Why do we need to debate such nonsense?

[John Iacoletti]

There are witnesses that confirm they saw a person with a rifle in the TSBD.  Oswald has no alibi for the moment of the assassination.  He is person known to the FBI even prior to the assassination.  At a minimum, he becomes a person of interest from the moment the DPD finds out his wacky background, that he worked in the building, and that he left in the immediate aftermath.  The investigation would then confirm from his wife and the BY photos that he owned a rifle and that it could not be accounted for. in the place where he kept it.  If he somehow smuggles it out of the TSBD in a bag, it is soon found.  Same result.  Oswald is the prime suspect (i.e. guilty).

His “wacky background” had nothing to do with killing anyone. Also you have a weird notion of what it means to “confirm” something.