Nitpicky Question About The Bag

[Walt Cakebread]

Nothing to discuss. They are undated. Period.

The original list that was compiled on the evening of 11 / 22/ 63 is not dated....But any intelligent person can determine that it was typed up that evening by comparing the two lists.

The photocopy ( altered) of the evidence inventory list  can be seen on page 260 of Vol 24......
   
Warren Commission Hearings, Volume XXIV

Page 260 of 929
    
250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269

[John Iacoletti]

How does it’s being altered tell you anything about when the first one was written?

[Jerry Freeman]

The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well, and he could have wiped down the metal parts with his other shirt before putting it back on.

Another coulda-woulda-shoulda...Saw all that in some kind of a transcendental vision? Or is it just the adventitious conjecture of the Oswald did it puppets?
 
 

[John Iacoletti]

Another coulda-woulda-shoulda...Saw all that in some kind of a transcendental vision? Or is it just the adventitious conjecture of the Oswald did it puppets?

Yes, it's one in a long series of Lame LN excuses.

[Walt Cakebread]

The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well, and he could have wiped down the metal parts with his other shirt before putting it back on.

Anyway, a palm print of his was found on the rifle.

http://22november1963.org.uk/oswald-fingerprintpalmprint-evidence

--  MWT 

The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well,

This is a false statement that is rarely challenged.... The wood of stock of C2766 was NOT "rough ".....It's true that the wood was not highly polished, but it was not "rough".  There are many photos of the rifle and it's obvious that the wood isn't rough.

[Jerry Freeman]

Anyway, a palm print of his was found on the rifle....

http://22november1963.org.uk/oswald-fingerprintpalmprint-evidence

I thought this thread was about the 'bag'. Tommy wanders off again. The link doesn't work BTW...and it wasn't an official link anyway. Try it again  

[Bill Chapman]

The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well, and he could have wiped down the metal parts with his other shirt before putting it back on.

Anyway, a palm print of his was found on the rifle.

http://22november1963.org.uk/oswald-fingerprintpalmprint-evidence

--  MWT 

Makes sense that rifles and hand guns would have roughened surfaces, in order to grip more solidly.

[Walt Cakebread]

Makes sense that rifles and hand guns would have roughened surfaces, in order to grip more solidly.

I know without any doubt and from personal experience , that the wood of the military carcano is no more rough than the heavy brown paper, and cardboard that the police and FBI said they found prints on.   IMO the wooden stock of the carcano is actually smoother than the brown paper.